Swarm-Based Fraud Detection System Using AI Module Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data communication systems face challenges in efficiently detecting fraudulent transactions and malicious content, with existing methods often resulting in high false positive or false negative rates, impacting both customer experience and operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fraud detection computing system that utilizes a selective combination of evaluation tools, fraud analysis tools, and swarm organizational tools, including AI modules, to generate a fraud evaluation answer by processing data from various sources, and adjusts its tools and data sets based on accuracy feedback to improve automated fraud detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then fraudulent transactions can be detected, but false positive and false negative rates are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive and false negative rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple specialized AI modules, each responsible for detecting specific fraud patterns or analyzing particular data aspects. This modular architecture allows independent optimization of each module's detection accuracy while reducing overall false positive and false negative rates through diversified analysis perspectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple AI modules with different detection capabilities are merged into a unified fraud detection system. The system combines the outputs of various specialized modules, integrating diverse detection approaches to achieve higher overall accuracy and reliability compared to any single detection method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If more evaluation tools and data sources are used, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex system is segmented into multiple independent AI modules, each handling specific evaluation tools or data sources. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by organizing numerous tools into manageable, specialized units that can be independently developed, maintained, and optimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs universal AI modules that can process multiple types of data sources and evaluation tools through standardized interfaces. Each module is designed to be multi-functional, capable of handling various data formats and analysis methods, thereby reducing overall system complexity despite incorporating numerous tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If fraud detection processing is enhanced, then detection accuracy improves, but transaction processing time may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis using high-speed AI modules that can quickly assess obvious fraud indicators before deeper analysis is required. By conducting initial screening actions in advance, the system maintains fast transaction processing for normal cases while reserving enhanced processing only for suspicious transactions that require more thorough investigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial processing to most transactions, using only the essential evaluation tools needed for rapid decision-making. Enhanced processing with all available tools is applied selectively only when initial analysis indicates potential fraud, thereby maintaining fast processing times for the majority of transactions while ensuring high accuracy for suspicious cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230068511A1Interactive swarming
Publication Date: 2023.03.02 RAISE MARKETPLACE LLC
  • US20230068511A1 patent drawing
  • US20230068511A1 patent drawing
  • US20230068511A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes evaluating a transaction using a first swarm member to generate a first cooperative prediction related to the transaction. The first cooperative prediction is based, at least in part, on a first affinity value of the first swarm member to one or more other swarm members. The method also includes evaluating the transaction using a second swarm member to arrive at a second cooperative prediction related to the transaction. The second cooperative prediction is based, at least in part, on a second affinity of the second swarm member to one or more other swarm members. A swarm prediction related to the transaction is generated based on both the first cooperative prediction and the second cooperative prediction.