Swarm Learning Defect Prevention With Blockchain Root-Cause Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional defect management systems are inefficient due to high false positive rates, leading to increased operational costs and long debug times, and lack proactive defect prevention mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized particle swarm model integrated with blockchain and edge computing for defect analysis and prevention, utilizing swarm learning intelligence to categorize defects and generate predictive models for defect prevention, supported by VR/AR simulations and machine learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional reactive defect management is used, then defect tracking and resolution process is simple, but debug time and operational cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect management process simplicityVSAvoiddebug time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by analyzing failure logs and executing root cause analysis before defects are reported. The predictive model proactively identifies potential defects and their root causes in advance, enabling the system to prepare resolution strategies beforehand, thereby reducing the time required when actual defects occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where failure logs are continuously analyzed, root causes are determined, and predictive models are updated with new insights. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from past defects and improve its predictive accuracy, leading to faster and more accurate defect identification in the future.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If traditional reactive defect management is used, then implementation cost is low, but operational cost increases due to extended resolution time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect management system complexityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary root cause analysis and predictive modeling before defects manifest, reducing the need for extensive post-incident investigations and prolonged resolution cycles, thereby lowering operational costs associated with time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated root cause analysis and predictive defect identification. By autonomously analyzing failure logs and generating resolution recommendations, the system reduces the manual intervention required, thereby lowering operational costs while maintaining effective defect management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If false positives are handled through traditional defect lifecycle, then defect tracking completeness is maintained, but development team productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect tracking completenessVSAvoiddevelopment team productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates false positives from actual defects through automated root cause analysis. By identifying and removing false positives (caused by environmental issues, test data problems, test script errors, or requirement gaps) from the development workflow, the system maintains tracking completeness for genuine defects while preventing development teams from wasting time on irrelevant issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated analysis between defect detection and development team intervention. This intermediary layer performs root cause analysis and categorizes defects, filtering out false positives before they reach the development team, thereby protecting productivity while maintaining comprehensive defect tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If swarm learning with blockchain is implemented, then defect prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the defect management functionality into distinct modules: failure log collection, root cause analysis, predictive modeling, and resolution recommendation. Each module operates independently and can be developed, tested, and maintained separately, reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining high prediction accuracy through specialized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12613796B2Intuitive defect prevention with swarm learning intelligence over blockchain network
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12613796B2 patent drawing
  • US12613796B2 patent drawing
  • US12613796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to a computing system that is configured to use heuristic and/or metaheuristic algorithms based on swarm learning (SL) intelligence frameworks and combine SL with blockchain and edge computing frameworks to provide a technologically efficient, responsive, and/or adaptable solution to detecting and preventing defects in software applications.