Swarm Robot Reinforcement for Load-Adaptive Robotic Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic structures lack the ability to dynamically adjust their structural reinforcement based on applied loads, leading to potential damage and safety risks due to operator errors in load management.

Innovation Solution

Positioning swarm robots relative to the robotic structure to enhance structural strength by increasing the moment of inertia and reinforcing vulnerable areas, using mechanisms like clamps or magnetic couplers to stabilize the swarm robots in place.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional robotic structures are used without dynamic reinforcement, then the device complexity is low, but the structural strength is insufficient when loads exceed thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic structure is divided into vulnerable areas that can be independently reinforced. Swarm robots are deployed to specific segments or areas of the structure rather than reinforcing the entire structure uniformly, allowing targeted strengthening where loads exceed thresholds while maintaining simplicity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic structure transitions from a static configuration to a dynamic one by deploying swarm robots to vulnerable areas only when needed. The system continuously monitors applied loads and dynamically adjusts reinforcement by moving swarm robots to or from vulnerable areas, transforming the structure's strength characteristics in response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If swarm robots are deployed to reinforce vulnerable areas, then the structural strength increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs autonomous swarm robots that can independently navigate to vulnerable areas and attach themselves to the robotic structure without requiring complex external control mechanisms. The swarm robots self-organize and self-position to provide reinforcement, reducing the need for complex deployment mechanisms while maintaining the ability to dynamically strengthen the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the robotic structure is reinforced dynamically, then the reliability improves, but the ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates load monitoring that provides feedback on applied loads to the control mechanism. When loads approach or exceed structural thresholds, the feedback triggers deployment of swarm robots to vulnerable areas. This closed-loop feedback system automatically adjusts reinforcement based on real-time conditions, improving reliability while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents structural thresholds from being exceeded, reducing damage and ensuring safety by dynamically adjusting the robotic structure's strength in response to applied loads, thereby minimizing repair costs and preventing accidents.

Implementation Method 1

Positioning swarm robots relative to the robotic structure to enhance structural strength by increasing the moment of inertia

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment of inertia: Moment of Inertia

Implementation Method 2

using mechanisms like clamps or magnetic couplers to stabilize the swarm robots in place

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12409549B2Increasing strength of a robotic structure using swarm robot(s)
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12409549B2 patent drawing
  • US12409549B2 patent drawing
  • US12409549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method according to one embodiment includes identifying a load that will be applied to a robotic structure, and determining whether the load, when applied to the robotic structure, would exceed a structural threshold of the robotic structure. In response to determining that the load, when applied to the robotic structure, would exceed the structural threshold, a position of one or more swarm robots with respect to the robotic structure is determined that would increase a structural strength of the robotic structure, and the one or more swarm robots are caused to assume the determined position. A computer program product according to another embodiment includes a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith. The program instructions are readable and/or executable by a computer to cause the computer to perform the foregoing method.