Swarm Robot Streaming Analytics With Dynamic Task Reassignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing swarm robotics approaches struggle with efficient communication and coordination protocols, decentralized decision-making, and ensuring the reliability and efficiency of individual robots and the swarm in dynamic environments, particularly in managing streaming applications.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves assigning processing elements to a selected group of robots within a swarm, actively monitoring their performance, and dynamically reassigning tasks to optimize throughput. This includes modifying the distribution of tasks among robots, such as fusing or splitting processing elements, and allowing physical repositioning to enhance performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If processing elements are statically assigned to robots in a swarm, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to changing conditions and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task assignment where processing elements are not statically bound to specific robots but are continuously reallocated based on current swarm performance, energy levels, and task requirements. This allows the system to adapt to changing conditions in real-time, optimizing throughput while maintaining operational simplicity through automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous monitoring of robot performance, energy consumption, and task completion rates, using this feedback to dynamically adjust processing element assignment. This feedback loop enables the swarm to self-optimize its configuration, improving productivity without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If processing elements are dynamically reassigned to optimize throughput, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring performance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The swarm system performs self-optimization through automated monitoring and dynamic reassignment of processing elements. Each robot and processing element acts autonomously to report status and receive new assignments, eliminating the need for complex external control systems while maintaining high throughput through continuous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the swarm adapts to changing conditions through dynamic reassignment, then adaptability is improved, but loss of time for reconfiguration and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains a ready pool of processing elements and pre-establishes assignment protocols, enabling rapid reconfiguration when conditions change. By having resources prepared in advance and clear rules for allocation, the swarm can adapt to new conditions with minimal reconfiguration time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250189990A1Streaming analytics in swarm robots
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250189990A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189990A1 patent drawing
  • US20250189990A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is provided that manages a streaming application using a swarm of robots. It involves assigning a set of processing elements to a selected group of robots within a first swarm, with each robot performing a specific operation within the application. The process includes the active monitoring of the performance of these robots. Based on this monitoring, there is a dynamic reassignment of the processing elements. This reassignment leads to the selection of a different group of robots, potentially varying in number from the first group.