Swarming Vehicle Test Coordination for Reproducible AV Scenarios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing methods for autonomous vehicles and advanced driver-assistance systems are inadequate in simulating real-world scenarios to assess vehicle performance and safety, particularly due to the limitations of human involvement in test environments, which can introduce variability and risk.

Innovation Solution

An automated swarming vehicle test environment utilizing a vehicle automation platform that coordinates a swarm of autonomous vehicles to perform choreographed maneuvers, allowing for precise control and communication of test plans to evaluate the response of a test vehicle, thereby reducing human error and ensuring consistent, reproducible testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human drivers are used in traditional testing methods, then real-world scenario simulation is possible, but variability and safety risks are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting consistencyVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses autonomous vehicles that replicate human driving behaviors and responses through programmed algorithms. These autonomous test vehicles copy human reaction patterns, decision-making processes, and driving styles without requiring actual human drivers, thereby eliminating human variability and safety risks while maintaining realistic testing scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human drivers with an automated control system. The autonomous vehicles use sensors, processors, and actuators to substitute human physiological and neurological functions, converting human-driven testing into an automated electronic control system that provides consistent, reproducible results without human safety risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more test vehicles are deployed to simulate complex scenarios, then testing comprehensiveness is improved, but coordination and control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescenario complexityVSAvoidsystem coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple autonomous vehicles into a coordinated swarm that operates under unified control. The vehicles communicate with each other and with a central management system, combining their individual capabilities into a cohesive testing platform that can simulate complex multi-vehicle scenarios while maintaining centralized coordination to manage system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicles are designed with universal, multi-functional capabilities that allow them to perform various testing roles. Each vehicle can adapt its behavior, sensors, and functions based on the specific testing scenario requirements, enabling a single vehicle design to handle diverse complex scenarios without requiring specialized vehicles for each test type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If traditional testing methods are used, then setup and execution are simpler, but testing efficiency and data collection are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtest setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary programming and configuration of autonomous vehicles before actual testing begins. Test scenarios, vehicle behaviors, sensor calibrations, and data collection parameters are all pre-configured through software, allowing rapid deployment and execution of multiple test scenarios without time-consuming physical setup, thereby significantly improving testing efficiency and reducing setup time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12485910B2Automated swarming vehicle test environment
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12485910B2 patent drawing
  • US12485910B2 patent drawing
  • US12485910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated swarming vehicle test environment includes a vehicle automation platform (VAP), a first swarming vehicle, and a second swarming vehicle. In some embodiments, a first test plan is created by a VAP for a first swarming vehicle. The first test plan comprises: a time series of vehicle trajectory data for the first swarming vehicle, and position data for the first swarming vehicle relative to a test vehicle. The first test plan is sent from the VAP to the first swarming vehicle. In some embodiments, a second test plan is created by the VAP for a second swarming vehicle. The second test plan comprises: a time series of vehicle trajectory data for the second swarming vehicle, and position data for the second swarming vehicle relative to the test vehicle. The second test plan is sent from the VAP to the second swarming vehicle.