Swash Plate Compressor Suction Pulsation Damper

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suction pulsation reduction apparatuses for swash plate type compressors require separate metal parts for assembly, increasing manufacturing costs and complexity, and do not effectively prevent rotation during coolant suction.

Innovation Solution

A suction pulsation reduction apparatus with all parts, including a case and core, integrally formed using plastic injection molding, featuring a latching portion and hook structures to limit the core's movement and prevent rotation, simplifying assembly and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If separate metal parts are used for the case and cover in the suction pulsation reduction apparatus, then the structural strength and durability are improved, but the manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the case and cover into a single integrated case structure. The case includes a body portion forming the main chamber and a closed end portion that replaces the separate cover, eliminating the need for separate metal parts while maintaining structural integrity through the unified plastic injection-molded design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated case serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the main chamber structure, acts as the closed end, supports the core portion movement, and includes the axial groove for flow control. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate cover and support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If separate metal parts are used for the case and cover, then the structural integrity is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The case and cover are merged into a single integrated case that is injection-molded as one piece. This eliminates the need for separate manufacturing processes and assembly operations, significantly reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining structural integrity through the unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to plastic and the manufacturing process parameter from separate machining and assembly to single-step injection molding. This parameter change reduces manufacturing cost while the integrated design maintains structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the core portion is allowed to move freely, then the valve can respond to pressure changes, but rotation during coolant suction occurs causing instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve responseVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetric features: the core portion has an asymmetric cross-sectional shape that fits into the case, and the axial groove is positioned asymmetrically. This asymmetric design allows the core to move linearly in response to pressure changes while preventing rotational movement, ensuring operational stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The case includes a pre-formed axial groove and asymmetric structural features that constrain the core portion's movement path before operation begins. This preliminary constraint design ensures that the core can respond to pressure changes linearly without rotating during coolant suction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If an opening/closing valve is added to control suction flow, then pulsation and noise are reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepulsation and noiseVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core portion serves multiple functions: it acts as the opening/closing valve to control suction flow, provides the axial groove for flow regulation, and serves as the moving element constrained by the case structure. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity while maintaining pulsation and noise reduction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The valve function, flow control groove, and moving element are merged into a single integrated core portion design. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate valve components while maintaining the ability to reduce pulsation and noise through controlled suction flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated design simplifies the structure, reduces assembly and manufacturing costs, and effectively prevents rotation during coolant suction by using plastic injection molding and hook mechanisms, enhancing the apparatus's functionality and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic spring (300) inserted into the case (100) and seated on the other side surface of the case (100) to elastically support the core portion (200)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a core portion (200) moving in a longitudinal direction in the case (100) according to the suction pressure of the coolant introduced from the inlet (110) to control an opening/closing area of the inlet (110)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10844853B2Intake pulsation damper of swash plate-type compressor
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 HANON SYST CO LTD
  • US10844853B2 patent drawing
  • US10844853B2 patent drawing
  • US10844853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a suction pulsation reducing device of a swash plate type compressor, and more particularly, to a suction pulsation reduction apparatus provided on a suction channel formed in a rear head of a swash plate type compressor, in which a moving range of a core portion is limited and all parts to be mounted on a suction channel are integrally formed in a case.