Swimmer Wearable Alert Prioritization for Multi-Sensor Safety Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing swimmer safety technologies are fragmented and fail to comprehensively detect and prioritize alerts based on the severity and immediacy of threats, leading to delayed or inappropriate responses.

Innovation Solution

A wearable device equipped with sensors (water contact, accelerometer, range detector) and an advanced alert mechanism that differentiates alerts into various levels of urgency, using algorithms to prioritize responses based on real-time risk assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a wearable device uses multiple sensors to comprehensively detect swimmer safety conditions, then the detection capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswimmer safety detection capabilityVSAvoidsensor array and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments safety monitoring into distinct sensor functions (water contact detection, fall detection via accelerometer, range detection via Bluetooth) that operate independently but contribute to overall safety monitoring. Each sensor targets a specific hazard type, allowing comprehensive coverage while maintaining manageable complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wearable device integrates multiple sensors into a single universal platform that can detect various safety conditions (water contact, falls, range deviations) simultaneously. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate devices, improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the system transmits all safety alerts with equal urgency, then simplicity of operation is maintained, but response effectiveness to critical situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert transmission simplicityVSAvoidresponse effectiveness to critical threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alert system applies local quality by differentiating alert urgency based on the specific safety condition detected. Critical alerts (falls, water contact) are transmitted with high urgency, while less critical conditions (range deviations) use lower urgency. This targeted approach ensures that truly critical situations receive immediate attention while maintaining operational simplicity through automated differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the urgency parameter of alerts based on the detected safety condition. By dynamically adjusting alert priority levels according to the severity and type of detected hazard, the system maintains ease of operation (automatic differentiation) while significantly improving response effectiveness to critical threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the wearable device continuously monitors all safety parameters, then detection precision is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time safety parameter detectionVSAvoidbattery power for continuous monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by having sensors activate and transmit data at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. This allows the device to maintain detection precision across all safety parameters while significantly reducing overall energy consumption through periodic rather than constant operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by focusing intensive monitoring on critical parameters (water contact, falls) while using less frequent monitoring for less critical parameters (range detection). This selective monitoring approach maintains measurement precision for safety-critical conditions while reducing energy consumption through reduced monitoring intensity for non-critical parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances swimmer safety by ensuring timely and appropriate responses to emergent situations through differentiated alert levels, improving intervention strategies.

Implementation Method 1

a water contact sensor configured to determine when an amount of water surrounding the wearable device exceeds a predetermined water contact threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conductivity: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

an accelerometer configured to detect whether the swimmer has fallen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 3

a range detector configured to determine when the swimmer is out of a range of the at least one alert device, where the range detector may comprise a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) transmitter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250363882A1System, method, and wearable device for swimmer safety
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 SAFETY SWIM LLC
  • US20250363882A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363882A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363882A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for swimmer safety that may utilize a wearable device configured to be worn by a swimmer and at least one alert device. The wearable device may include a water contact sensor, an accelerometer, a range detector with Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) transmitter, a battery, and a real-time state management controller. The water contact sensor may determine when surrounding water exceeds a predetermined water contact threshold. The accelerometer may detect falls. The range detector may determine when the swimmer moves out of range. The controller may receive inputs from these components, manage operational states, and generate real-time state data. The wearable device may transmit alerts upon detecting at least one critical event such as, water contact, a fall, the wearable device being out of range, or low battery.