Swinging Drive Control Using Motor Back-EMF Detection Without Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automatic swings and rocking chairs or glider chairs require costly sensors for swinging frequency and phase tracking, as well as amplitude control, leading to high costs.

Innovation Solution

A swinging drive control apparatus using a controller and motor that detects counter-electromotive force to control the motor's operation, eliminating the need for sensors by adjusting PWM pulse duty factors and driving times based on detected counter-electromotive force values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sensors are used to implement swinging frequency and phase tracking as well as amplitude control, then control precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswinging frequency and phase tracking precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves itself by using its own counter-electromotive force signal for feedback control. The controller detects the counter-electromotive force generated during motor operation and uses this signal to determine swinging state and adjust driving parameters, eliminating the need for external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-electromotive force detection serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides feedback for frequency and phase tracking, amplitude control, and swinging state determination. One detection mechanism achieves what would traditionally require multiple separate sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If sensors are used to implement swinging frequency and phase tracking as well as amplitude control, then control precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswinging amplitude control precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves itself by using its own counter-electromotive force signal for feedback control. The controller detects the counter-electromotive force generated during motor operation and uses this signal to determine swinging state and adjust driving parameters, eliminating the need for external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-electromotive force detection serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides feedback for frequency and phase tracking, amplitude control, and swinging state determination. One detection mechanism achieves what would traditionally require multiple separate sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If sensors are used to implement swinging frequency and phase tracking as well as amplitude control, then control precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswinging frequency and phase tracking precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor serves itself by using its own counter-electromotive force signal for feedback control. The controller detects the counter-electromotive force generated during motor operation and uses this signal to determine swinging state and adjust driving parameters, eliminating the need for external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The counter-electromotive force detection serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides feedback for frequency and phase tracking, amplitude control, and swinging state determination. One detection mechanism achieves what would traditionally require multiple separate sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If counter-electromotive force detection is used instead of sensors, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidswinging state detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical or optical sensing systems with an electrical detection method. By measuring the counter-electromotive force (an electrical parameter) generated during motor operation, the system infers mechanical swinging state parameters such as position, velocity, and acceleration without physical contact or external sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables effective swinging frequency and phase tracking, as well as amplitude control without sensors, simplifying the control system and reducing costs while maintaining comfort and resonance.

Implementation Method 1

the controller detects a counter-electromotive force of the motor and drives the motor according to the detection result

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-electromotive force: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

generally use motors to drive swinging objects to swing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10646786B1Swinging drive control apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 SUZHOU LUCKY INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US10646786B1 patent drawing
  • US10646786B1 patent drawing
  • US10646786B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a swinging drive control apparatus, including a controller and a motor, where the controller detects a counter-electromotive force of the motor and drives the motor according to the detection result. Also disclosed is a corresponding method, including: measuring a counter-electromotive force of a motor in a previous cycle; and comparing a maximum counter-electromotive force value with a preset value, and calculating a PWM pulse duty factor in a next cycle. By directly detecting the counter-electromotive force of the motor without using a sensor, the present invention implements swinging frequency and phase tracking as well as swinging amplitude control, and simplifies a control system.