Swinging Spinal Screw Channel for Controlled Rod Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spinal support rod systems face challenges in applying appropriate forces during implantation to correct spinal deformations, particularly in ensuring balanced forces across the spinal column and preventing bone tissue damage from high localized forces.

Innovation Solution

A fixation screw assembly with a rod receiving channel that can swing through a range of angles relative to the fixation screw, allowing for easier insertion and alignment of the support rod, combined with a dual locking device to secure the rod in place, enabling controlled application of translational and torsional forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a fixed support rod system is used to correct spinal deformities, then the alignment can be maintained, but it is difficult to apply progressive corrective forces without risking bone tissue damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrective force applicationVSAvoidbone tissue damage from high localized forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support rod system incorporates adjustable locking mechanisms that allow the rod to transition from a flexible state during implantation to a fixed state after correction. The rod can be bent to the desired configuration and then locked in place, enabling progressive force application without permanent damage to bone tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the mechanical parameters of the support rod by adjusting the locking mechanisms at different positions. This enables control over the magnitude and distribution of corrective forces applied to vertebrae, preventing excessive localized forces that could damage bone tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple locking mechanisms are used to secure the rod, then the rod can be firmly fixed, but the implantation procedure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverod fixation stabilityVSAvoidnumber of locking components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is integrated directly into the support rod structure itself, combining the rod and locking components into a single unified device. This reduces the number of separate parts and simplifies the implantation procedure while maintaining reliable fixation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support rod incorporates self-locking features that allow it to be securely fixed without requiring multiple separate locking operations. The rod can be bent to the desired shape and then locked in place through an integrated mechanism, reducing procedural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the support rod is made highly flexible to accommodate spinal curvature, then it can be easily inserted, but it may not provide sufficient corrective force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverod insertion easeVSAvoidcorrective force magnitude
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The support rod is designed with dynamic mechanical properties that allow it to be flexible during insertion but rigid during correction. The rod can be bent to match spinal curvature during implantation, then locked in place to provide sufficient corrective force for maintaining alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical parameters of the support rod are changed from flexible to rigid through the locking mechanism. During insertion, the rod maintains flexibility for easy accommodation to spinal curvature, then after locking, it provides the necessary rigidity to deliver adequate corrective force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10987145B2Methods for correction of spinal deformities
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 MEDOS INT SARL
  • US10987145B2 patent drawing
  • US10987145B2 patent drawing
  • US10987145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of treating a spinal column shape deformation includes fixing at least two fixation screw assemblies to respective vertebrae, sliding a rod between the arm extensions on each of the fixation screw assemblies, swinging the channels of the screw assemblies relative to the fixation screws so that the channels become less inclined to the axes of the fixation screws, and so that the rod is located generally posteriorly of the spinal column, locking the channel against swinging relative to the screw, rotating the rod about its axis relative to at least one of the channels, and locking the rod against movement relative to the channel.