Swirl Mesh Lean Direct Injection Combustor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine combustors face inefficiencies due to high pressure losses and combustion instability caused by swirlers, leading to increased NOx emissions and weight from thermal protection, despite previous attempts to control fuel distribution and emissions.

Innovation Solution

A hexagonal packing arrangement of swirlers minimizes solid mass and pressure loss, enabling direct fuel distribution through swirl mesh lean injection, with fuel injected at the center or periphery of swirlers, reducing flame temperature and residence time, and allowing for active control of combustion instability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If swirlers with small passages are used to redirect air around the head end, then flame holding is improved, but pressure losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame holdingVSAvoidpressure losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel distribution system is segmented into multiple direct injection points distributed around the combustor head end, replacing the single swirler approach. This segmentation allows fuel to be injected at multiple locations where it can be efficiently mixed with air without requiring high-pressure drops through small passages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel injection function is extracted from the swirler structure and implemented as separate direct injection points. This separation allows the air flow path to be optimized for minimal pressure loss while fuel is injected directly into the high-velocity air stream at strategically located points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If high fuel-to-air ratio is used to hold flame against high velocity forces, then flame stabilization is improved, but NOx emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame stabilizationVSAvoidNOx emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel-to-air ratio is optimized locally at each injection point rather than using a uniform high ratio throughout. Fuel is injected directly into high-velocity air streams where immediate mixing occurs, creating localized combustion zones with optimized equivalence ratios that stabilize flames without excessive temperatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Fuel is pre-mixed with air in the high-velocity stream before combustion occurs. The direct injection into the air stream allows preliminary mixing and atomization, creating a more uniform fuel-air distribution that promotes stable combustion at lower overall fuel-to-air ratios, thereby reducing NOx formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If multiple swirler assemblies are used to reduce pressure drop, then area change is improved, but interaction between flames decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidflame interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple direct fuel injection points are merged into a unified distribution system that operates cooperatively. The injection points are positioned to create overlapping combustion zones that interact and stabilize each other, providing flame holding reliability similar to or better than multiple swirler assemblies while maintaining lower pressure drops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances combustion efficiency, reduces NOx emissions, and decreases combustor weight by minimizing pressure losses and thermal protection needs, while stabilizing flames against high velocities and reducing combustion instability.

Implementation Method 1

A hexagonal packing arrangement of swirlers minimizes solid mass and pressure loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure loss: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

enabling direct fuel distribution through swirl mesh lean injection, with fuel injected at the center or periphery of swirlers, reducing flame temperature and residence time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame temperature reduction: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

The swirl flow causes low velocity regions for the flame to stabilize in the combustor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirl flow: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentEP3485197B1Method for direct fuel distribution in gas turbine combustors and gas turbine combustor
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 AEROSTROVILOS ENERGY PTE LTD
  • EP3485197B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3485197B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3485197B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(b)

AI summary

A swirl mesh lean direct injection concept for distributed flame holding for low pollutant emissions and mitigation of combustion instability. The invention further relates to a new method for flame holding with least pressure drop and flame temperature, in gas turbine engine combustors, wherein the liner of the combustor is partially or fully replaced with a "swirl mesh". The invention has lean direct injection for fuel distribution over several points in gas turbine combustors along with swirl arrangement for air injection which provides low pollutant emission and low combustion instability.