Swirling Fluidized Bed Combustion for Biomass Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluidized bed combustion systems face challenges in achieving high combustion efficiencies and minimizing noxious emissions when disposing of biomass materials, particularly poultry litter, due to limitations in air injection designs and energy density issues, leading to high costs and environmental concerns.

Innovation Solution

A two-step combustion process utilizing an advanced swirling fluidized bed combustion chamber with staged secondary air injection in the tangential direction and a cyclone separator to enhance mixing and residence time of fuel particles, minimizing dioxin production and achieving high combustion efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional fluidized bed combustion systems with single-level secondary air injection are used, then the system structure is simple, but combustion efficiency is insufficient and noxious emissions cannot be minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidair injection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The secondary air injection system is segmented into multiple levels (first level and second level) with different injection angles and positions. The first level uses a first angle relative to the horizontal plane while the second level uses a second angle, allowing staged combustion and improved efficiency without overwhelming system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multi-dimensional air injection by varying both the vertical position (height) and injection angle of secondary air ports. This creates a three-dimensional combustion pattern that enhances mixing and residence time, transforming a simple horizontal injection system into a multi-level spatial combustion system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If biomass fuel with low energy density is used, then environmental benefits are achieved, but fuel collection and transportation costs become high relative to energy output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental pollutionVSAvoidenergy density
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of low energy density into a benefit by designing a combustion system that efficiently processes low-energy-density biomass through extended residence time and staged air injection. The system transforms what is normally an economic disadvantage into an acceptable operational parameter by achieving complete combustion and maximizing energy extraction from low-density fuels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters including air injection angles, injection levels, and residence time to optimize combustion of low energy density biomass. By adjusting these parameters, the system maximizes energy output from biomass fuels that would otherwise be economically unviable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If high moisture content biomass is combusted, then fuel availability is improved, but burn efficiency decreases and transportation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel availabilityVSAvoidburn efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary drying of high moisture biomass before combustion by exposing it to the heated environment and turbulent flow in the combustion chamber. The staged air injection and extended residence time allow moisture to evaporate before complete combustion occurs, preparing the fuel for efficient burning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous circulation and extended residence time in the fluidized bed ensure that moisture removal and combustion occur as continuous processes rather than discrete steps. This continuous action maintains optimal combustion conditions despite varying moisture content in the feedstock

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a combustion efficiency of at least 90%, significantly reducing capital and operating costs, with lower emissions and higher electrical output, making it a cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for biomass and poultry litter disposal.

Implementation Method 1

a primary air distribution and delivery system configured to provide vertical airflow through the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 2

a secondary air distribution and delivery system configured to provide a plurality of vertically displaced, horizontally aligned, tangential airflows in the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTangential flow:

Implementation Method 3

The secondary air increases the residence time of the particle flow. The turbulent flow of the fuel particles and air is well mixed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

Any waste and particles that remain unburned in the combustion chamber are directed to the cyclone separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Data Source

PatentUS10253974B1System and method for biomass combustion
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
  • US10253974B1 patent drawing
  • US10253974B1 patent drawing
  • US10253974B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system and method for the combustion of biomass material employing a swirling fluidized bed combustion (SFBC) chamber, and preferably a second stage combustion carried out in a cyclone separator. In the combustion chamber, primary air is introduced from a bottom air box that fluidizes the bed material and fuel, and staged secondary air is introduced in the tangential direction and at varied vertical positions in the combustion chamber so as to cause the materials in the combustion chamber (i.e., the mixture of air and particles) to swirl. The secondary air injection can have a significant effect on the air-fuel particle flow in the combustion chamber, and more particularly strengthens the swirling flow, promotes axial recirculation, increases particle mass fluxes in the combustion chamber, and retains more fuel particles in the combustion chamber. This process increases the residence time of the particle flow. The turbulent flow of the fuel particles and air is well mixed and mostly burned in the combustion chamber, with any unburned waste and particles being directed to the cyclone separator, where such unburned waste and particles are burned completely, and flying ash is divided and collected in a container connected to the cyclone separator, while dioxin production is significantly minimized if not altogether eliminated. The system exhaust is directed to a pollutant control unit and heat exchanger, where the captured heat may be put to useful work.