Switch Capacitor Buck-Boost Converter for Electric Vehicle Power Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional DC-DC boost converters for electric vehicles are inefficient due to high power rating requirements, leading to large and costly inductors, and poor partial-power efficiency, especially at high voltage ratios, which also increase cooling system size and weight.

Innovation Solution

A bidirectional switch capacitor buck-boost voltage converter that eliminates the need for a large inductor and filtering capacitor by using a switch capacitor circuit with a three-level inverter configuration, allowing for higher energy density and reduced costs, and is designed to handle high-power applications by limiting charging current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a conventional DC-DC boost converter is used to achieve voltage conversion, then the required DC-link voltage can be obtained, but the converter requires a large and costly inductor with high power rating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower ratingVSAvoidinductor weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the large inductor from the conventional boost converter topology and replaces it with a capacitor-based voltage multiplication circuit. This extraction of the inductor eliminates the associated weight, cost, and copper/core losses while achieving the same voltage boosting function through capacitive energy storage and switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the magnetic field-based inductor with an electric field-based capacitor switching network. This replacement transitions from magnetic energy storage to electric energy storage, eliminating the need for heavy magnetic cores and windings while achieving identical voltage conversion functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Power

If the inductor size is increased to match battery pack power, then the power rating is sufficient, but the copper and core losses increase proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower ratingVSAvoidcopper and core losses
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the magnetic field-based inductor with an electric field-based capacitor switching network. This substitution eliminates copper losses in the inductor windings and core losses in the magnetic material, while maintaining the same power handling capability through capacitive energy transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Power

If the boost converter operates with high duty cycle to achieve high voltage ratio, then the desired voltage can be obtained, but the efficiency is relatively low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage ratioVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic switching of capacitor charge and discharge cycles to achieve voltage multiplication. By rapidly switching capacitors between charging and discharging states, the circuit achieves high voltage ratios with low duty cycles, improving efficiency by avoiding the high-duty-cycle operation that plagues conventional boost converters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Power

If a high duty cycle is used for boosting, then the voltage ratio is achieved, but the RMS current applied to the bus capacitor increases impacting its size and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage ratioVSAvoidcapacitor size
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic switching of multiple capacitors in a voltage multiplication configuration, where capacitors are charged and discharged in alternating phases. This distributes the RMS current across multiple capacitors and switching events, reducing the current burden on any single bus capacitor and allowing for smaller, less expensive capacitor components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves higher power density, reduced weight, and improved efficiency by eliminating the inductor and using a switch capacitor technique, enabling higher voltage levels and efficient voltage conversion without the need for expensive batteries or complex battery management systems.

Implementation Method 1

a capacitor in the switch capacitor circuit configured to store charge during the charging state and drain charge during the discharging state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11309791B2Systems and methods for voltage conversion implementing a switched-capacitor circuit
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OPERATING MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
  • US11309791B2 patent drawing
  • US11309791B2 patent drawing
  • US11309791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A voltage conversion system including a source configured to supply a voltage and a switch capacitor circuit electrically coupled to the source. The switch capacitor circuit is configured to switch between a discharging state and a charging state. The switching between the discharging state and the charging state produces a boost to the supplied voltage. The voltage conversion system includes a capacitor in the switch capacitor circuit configured to store charge during the charging state and drain charge during the discharging state. The voltage conversion system includes a switching arrangement having a plurality of switch pairs configured to supply a converted voltage to a load. The switch capacitor circuit and the switching arrangement are interfaced to produce a unified circuit.