Network Switch Queueing for Mixed-Capacity Optical Links

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network communication systems face inefficiencies due to mismatched data transmission capabilities between network switches and servers, leading to suboptimal bandwidth utilization and increased costs in deploying high-capacity transceivers across the entire network.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system where network switches transmit data using higher-capacity transceivers, while servers receive and extract data using lower-capacity transceivers, allowing for pooled bandwidth allocation downstream and dedicated allocation upstream, with dynamic adjustment of optical subcarriers based on capacity requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If network switches use higher-capacity transceivers to transmit data, then bandwidth utilization is improved, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilizationVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different transceiver capacities to different network nodes based on their specific roles and requirements. Network switches use higher-capacity transceivers to aggregate and forward traffic efficiently, while servers use lower-capacity transceivers for their access links. This differentiated approach optimizes bandwidth utilization at each location without unnecessarily increasing device costs across the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic queueing schemes that adapt to varying traffic conditions and node capabilities. The queueing mechanism dynamically adjusts bandwidth allocation based on real-time network state, allowing higher-capacity transceivers to be fully utilized when needed while maintaining cost-effectiveness during lower-demand periods. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making transceiver capacity utilization flexible rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If high-capacity transceivers are deployed across the entire network, then network throughput is improved, but deployment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoiddeployment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by deploying high-capacity transceivers selectively at network switches where traffic aggregation and forwarding occur, rather than uniformly across all nodes. Servers and other end devices use lower-capacity transceivers appropriate for their access-rate requirements. This targeted deployment achieves high network throughput at critical points while significantly reducing overall deployment costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing high-capacity transceivers only where necessary to achieve the desired network throughput performance. Rather than over-provisioning the entire network with high-capacity equipment, the solution selectively enhances capacity at network switches and core nodes, achieving sufficient throughput performance while avoiding excessive deployment costs at edge nodes where full capacity is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If network switches transmit at higher throughput rates, then data transmission efficiency is improved, but compatibility with lower-capacity servers becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidcompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces network switches as intermediaries between high-capacity transmission infrastructure and lower-capacity servers. The switches operate at higher throughput rates to efficiently aggregate and forward traffic, while simultaneously providing interface adaptation to servers with lower-capacity transceivers. This intermediary role resolves the compatibility problem by decoupling the transmission efficiency requirements from the server interface requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting transmission parameters such as data rate, modulation format, and queueing policies based on the capabilities of communicating nodes. When transmitting to lower-capacity servers, the system adapts parameters to match server requirements while maintaining high overall network efficiency through optimized switching and multiplexing. This parameter adaptation enables seamless compatibility across heterogeneous network nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12355552B2Dynamically switching queueing schemes for network switches
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 INFINERA CORP
  • US12355552B2 patent drawing
  • US12355552B2 patent drawing
  • US12355552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example node includes a receiver, a switch circuit, and a transmitter. The receiver is configured to receive a first modulated optical signal including a first plurality of optical subcarriers, and supply a plurality of data streams based on the first plurality of optical subcarriers. Each of the data streams is associated with a corresponding one of the plurality of optical subcarriers. The switch circuit is configured to receive the data streams, and supply the data streams to a plurality of switch outputs. The transmitter is configured to receive the data streams, and supply a second modulated optical signal based on the data streams. The second modulated optical signal carries a second plurality of optical subcarriers. Each of the second plurality of optical subcarriers is associated with a corresponding one of the data streams.