Switchgear Cabinet Cooling Control Using Inlet-Outlet Temperature Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In high packing density switchgear cabinets, sensitive electrical units face inadequate cooling due to thermal interference, requiring a more efficient control of cooling power to maintain permissible inlet temperatures.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating inlet and outlet temperature sensors to measure temperature differences, allowing for requirement-oriented control of cooling power by regulating fan revolutions and cooling medium flow, ensuring constant inlet temperatures and efficient heat management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If high packing density is implemented in the switchgear cabinet, then spatial utilization is improved, but thermal interference between electrical units increases and cooling adequacy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking densityVSAvoidthermal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system using temperature sensors to monitor the temperature difference between inlet and outlet air of the cooling unit. The control unit adjusts the cooling power based on this temperature difference feedback, enabling dynamic adaptation to thermal conditions in high-density configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling unit's operational parameters are made dynamic through variable speed fans and adjustable cooling medium flow. This allows the cooling system to adapt its performance in real-time based on the thermal load generated by densely packed electrical units, maintaining effective cooling despite increased packing density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Temperature

If cooling power is increased to compensate for thermal interference, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic control of cooling power through variable speed fans and adjustable cooling medium flow rates. Instead of operating at constant high power, the cooling system adapts its energy consumption to the actual thermal load, maintaining cooling effectiveness while minimizing energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operational parameters (fan speed, cooling medium flow rate) based on measured temperature differences. This allows the system to optimize the balance between cooling effectiveness and energy consumption by adjusting parameters to match the actual cooling demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If temperature monitoring is implemented to enable precise cooling control, then cooling regulation precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature monitoring precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs temperature sensors to provide feedback on the cooling effectiveness by measuring the temperature difference between inlet and outlet air. This feedback mechanism enables precise cooling control without requiring overly complex control systems, as the temperature difference directly indicates whether cooling objectives are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables adaptive cooling power regulation, maintaining permissible inlet temperatures and optimizing cooling efficiency, thereby preventing thermal damage to electrical units and allowing for increased packing density without compromising cooling performance.

Implementation Method 1

an inlet temperature sensor which measures the temperature of the air to be cooled

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 2

An outlet temperature sensor measures the temperature of the cooled air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature measurement: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 3

Through one of the through-openings, warm switchgear cabinet air is drawn in by a fan and supplied to a heat exchanger of the cooling unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS7775061B2Unit arrangement
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 RITTALWERK RUDOLF LOH GMBH & CO KG
  • US7775061B2 patent drawing
  • US7775061B2 patent drawing
  • US7775061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A unit arrangement having a receiving housing, in particular a switchgear cabinet, in an interior of which electrical units are accommodated and having a cooling device which is in air-conducting communication with the interior of the receiving housing via at least one air inlet and at least one blower aperture, and a cooling operation monitoring device. A requirement-orientated control of the cooling operation is possible when the cooling operation monitoring device has an inlet temperature sensor which measures a temperature of the air to be cooled which is supplied to the cooling unit via the air inlet. An outlet temperature sensor measures a temperature of the cooled air which is supplied to the interior of the receiving housing via the blower aperture. A computing unit of the cooling operation monitoring device determines a temperature difference between the temperature measured by the inlet temperature sensor and the outlet temperature sensor.