Automated Parameterization of Switching Arrangement Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for parameterizing locking and release conditions for bay control devices and protective devices in electrical switchgear are complex, error-prone, and require significant manual effort, especially in larger systems, increasing the risk of incorrect configurations and security risks.

Innovation Solution

An automated method that uses topology information to derive locking and release conditions, allowing for decentralized decision-making and reducing the need for central control, with parameterization based on a modified search method that recognizes interconnections and operational philosophies, minimizing manual input and enhancing flexibility and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration of Boolean equations is used for each system, then locking conditions can be customized, but the complexity and error risk increase significantly for larger systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of locking conditionsVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates locking conditions by having the control devices self-configure based on topology information. Each bay control device or protective device autonomously receives relevant topology data and generates its own locking conditions without requiring manual configuration of Boolean equations, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The topology of the switching arrangement is determined in advance before the locking conditions are generated. This preliminary determination of the topological structure allows the system to pre-calculate and prepare the necessary locking conditions, reducing the complexity of on-site configuration while ensuring system-specific customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If automatic evaluation of topology is used, then configuration effort is reduced, but decentralized decision-making capability must be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration effortVSAvoiddecentralized control implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the control function into segments where individual bay control devices or protective devices independently evaluate topology information and generate their own locking conditions. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex centralized control while reducing configuration effort, as each device autonomously handles its own locking logic based on received topology data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If centralized control is used for locking decisions, then coordination is simplified, but security risks increase due to single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination simplicityVSAvoidsecurity risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented across multiple bay control devices or protective devices, each independently capable of making locking decisions based on topology information. This distributed architecture eliminates the single point of failure inherent in centralized control while maintaining coordination through shared topology data, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where control devices continuously monitor and evaluate topology information to dynamically adjust locking conditions. This feedback loop ensures coordinated control across the system while distributing decision-making authority, reducing security risks associated with centralized control while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3086428B1Method and assembly for parameterizing field control devices and/or protection devices of a circuit assembly
Publication Date: 2020.02.26 SIEMENS AG
  • EP3086428B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3086428B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3086428B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for the automatic parameterization of field control devices (100, 101, 102, 103) and/or protection devices of a switching arrangement (1, 20, 30, 90, 31, 32, 33), comprising the steps: - automatic detection of the topology of the switching arrangement (1, 20, 30, 90, 31, 32, 33) based on topology information, and automatic determination of interlock and/or release conditions for at least one device (100, 101, 102, 103) based on the topology, - automatic specification of communication links (95, 110) for the at least one device (100, 101, 102, 103) taking into account the interlock and/or release conditions determined for this device, - parameterization of the at least one device (100, 101, 102, 103) with the interlock and/or release conditions determined for this device Release conditions and the communication links (95,110) and the topology, so that in the operation of the switching arrangement (1,20,30,90,31,32,33) a locking or releasing of a switching operation in which at least one device (100, 101, 102, 103) is controllable. Furthermore, the present invention relates to an arrangement for parameterizing field control devices and/or protective devices of a switching arrangement.