Switching Element Driver With Dynamic Gate Clamp for Surge Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver apparatuses for voltage-controlled switching elements fail to effectively suppress surge voltage when the switching element transitions from an off-state to an on-state, leading to increased current and surge voltage due to excessive clamping voltage.

Innovation Solution

A driver apparatus with on-state transition, off-state transition, clamp, and voltage-drop-rate decreasing means, which clamps the voltage difference between the switching element's control terminal and reference terminal at a threshold voltage greater than the clamping voltage, and adjusts the voltage-drop-rate to suppress surge voltage by turning on the soft-interruption switching element when the current exceeds a clamp threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the voltage between gate and emitter is kept constant during on-state, then the switching element can be reliably turned on, but the current may increase excessively when turning off causing surge voltage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching element turn-on reliabilityVSAvoidsurge voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static voltage clamping to dynamic voltage control. The gate-emitter voltage is no longer kept constant but is dynamically adjusted based on the current state: during turn-on, voltage is increased to ensure reliable switching; during turn-off, voltage is reduced to prevent excessive current increase and surge voltage. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between maintaining reliable turn-on and preventing surge voltage during turn-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the voltage parameter dynamically based on operational phase. Instead of maintaining a fixed gate-emitter voltage, the system modifies the voltage level according to whether the switching element is turning on or off. During turn-on, higher voltage ensures reliable activation; during turn-off, reduced voltage prevents excessive current increase. This parameter change strategy resolves the technical contradiction by adapting the voltage level to the specific operational requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If the voltage between gate and emitter is increased to allow higher current, then the current capacity increases, but the surge voltage increases when the switching element turns off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent capacityVSAvoidsurge voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic voltage control to resolve the contradiction between current capacity and surge voltage. During the on-state, the gate-emitter voltage is maintained at a level that allows sufficient current capacity. During the turn-off transition, the voltage is dynamically reduced to prevent excessive current increase that would lead to surge voltage. This temporal separation of voltage levels resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing the voltage reduction before the turn-off completes. The gate-emitter voltage is reduced in advance during the transition phase, preventing the current from increasing excessively before the switching element fully turns off. This preliminary voltage reduction prevents the surge voltage condition while maintaining adequate current capacity during the on-state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If the voltage clamp is applied during on-state, then the current is limited, but the voltage-drop-rate becomes too high causing surge voltage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent limitationVSAvoidvoltage-drop-rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the voltage clamp adaptive rather than fixed. During the on-state, voltage clamping limits the current as intended. During the turn-off transition, the voltage clamp is adjusted to reduce the voltage-drop-rate, preventing surge voltage. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between current limitation and voltage-drop-rate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the voltage clamp parameter based on the operational phase. During on-state, the clamp maintains current limitation; during turn-off, the clamp parameter is modified to reduce the voltage-drop-rate. This parameter change resolves the technical contradiction by adapting the clamping behavior to the specific operational requirement, ensuring both current limitation and controlled voltage transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8749279B2Driver apparatus for switching elements
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 DENSO CORP
  • US8749279B2 patent drawing
  • US8749279B2 patent drawing
  • US8749279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a driver apparatus for driving a voltage-controlled switching element, an absolute value of a voltage difference between a voltage at a reference terminal that is one of terminals of a current path of the switching element and a voltage at the switching control terminal of the switching element is clamped at a clamping voltage greater than a threshold voltage. A voltage greater than the threshold voltage applied to the switching control terminal allows the switching element to be turned on. When the current flowing through the switching element becomes equal to or greater than a clamp threshold after the switching element transitions from an off-state to an on-state, a voltage-drop-rate at which the absolute value is decreased to the clamping voltage is decreased.