Switching Regulator Right-Half-Plane-Zero Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Step-up/down switching regulators face challenges in preventing right-half-plane-zero characteristics while maintaining cost-effectiveness and achieving response characteristics similar to step-down modes, particularly in start-stop vehicles where battery voltage drops significantly.

Innovation Solution

A switching regulator configuration that includes a first and second switch connected to an inductor, with a third and fourth switch, and control circuits generating step-down and step-up control signals to manage output voltage, keeping the ON-duty of the third switch fixed in a step-up/down mode, thereby avoiding right-half-plane-zero characteristics without increasing capacitor or reactor costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a common step-up/down switching regulator configuration is used, then the regulator can maintain output voltage during battery voltage drops, but right-half-plane-zero characteristics occur causing poor response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage stabilityVSAvoidresponse speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the ON-duty of the third switch variable rather than fixed. The control circuit adjusts the ON-duty dynamically based on operating conditions to prevent right-half-plane-zero characteristics while maintaining output voltage stability, thereby improving response speed without sacrificing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of switch duty cycle from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted by the control circuit. By changing the ON-duty parameter of the third switch according to operating conditions, the system eliminates right-half-plane-zero characteristics and achieves better response characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the capacitance of the output capacitor is increased to improve response, then response characteristics improve, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing capacitor capacitance to improve response, the patent changes the control parameter (ON-duty of third switch) to achieve improved response characteristics. This parameter change approach allows response improvement without increasing component specifications or manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If a step-down switching regulator portion is added in series to improve response, then response characteristics improve, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcircuit configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing switching regulator circuit multi-functional by enabling it to operate in different modes (step-up, step-down, and step-up/down) through dynamic control of switch duties. This eliminates the need for separate step-down regulator portions, reducing device complexity while maintaining improved response characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

By dynamically adjusting the ON-duty of the third switch, the existing circuit can adapt its behavior to achieve response characteristics similar to step-down mode without requiring additional circuitry. The dynamic control allows one circuit to perform multiple functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures stable response characteristics similar to step-down modes, preventing right-half-plane-zero issues and reducing the need for high-capacitance output capacitors and separate reactors, thus maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

an inductor L11

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

MOS transistors Q11 and Q12 as step-down switches, an inductor L11, MOS transistors Q13 and Q14 as step-up switches

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

an output capacitor C11

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10355589B2Switching regulator
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 ROHM CO LTD
  • US10355589B2 patent drawing
  • US10355589B2 patent drawing
  • US10355589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a switching regulator, a first switch and a second switch are turned ON and OFF complementarily according to an output voltage. In a step-up/down mode, a third switch and a fourth switch are turned ON and OFF complementarily while the ON-duty D of the third switch is kept fixed.