Switching Server Channel Switch Instruction Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In IPTV services, channel switching efficiency is hindered by the inability of Set-Top Boxes (STBs) to determine appropriate actions when channel switching requests are rejected due to insufficient switching resources, leading to suboptimal resource utilization and user experience degradation.

Innovation Solution

A channel switching processing method where the switching server performs exception handling and sends specific instruction information to the STB when resources are insufficient, allowing the STB to perform alternative operations rather than directly rejecting the request, thereby optimizing resource use and improving switching efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the switching server directly rejects the channel switching request when switching resource information does not meet the switching condition, then the server avoids allocating insufficient resources, but the channel switching efficiency deteriorates because the STB cannot determine how to process after rejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation reliabilityVSAvoidchannel switching efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching server provides detailed feedback information to the STB when resource conditions are not met, including specific rejection reasons and alternative processing instructions. This enables the STB to make informed decisions about alternative operations (such as switching to a different channel or waiting for resource availability), thereby maintaining switching efficiency while ensuring reliable resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the STB to autonomously determine appropriate processing actions based on the feedback received from the switching server. Instead of requiring server-mediated decision-making for every rejection scenario, the STB uses the provided feedback information to self-determine the best course of action, improving overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the switching server directly rejects the channel switching request when resources are insufficient, then the server protects its resources, but the available resources in the switching server are not fully used, affecting channel switching efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource protectionVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts resource allocation decisions based on real-time feedback exchange between the switching server and STB. When resources are temporarily insufficient, the server provides feedback that enables the STB to perform alternative operations that can still utilize available resources effectively, rather than implementing static rejection policies that waste potential resource capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The switching server changes the parameter of resource allocation from a binary reject/accept decision to a multi-option feedback system that includes rejection reasons, alternative channel suggestions, and timing information. This parameter change enables more flexible resource utilization while maintaining protection against over-allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the STB receives only a rejection message without specific rejection reason, then the message transmission is simple, but the STB cannot continue corresponding processing, affecting channel switching efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage complexityVSAvoidswitching processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching server implements a feedback mechanism that provides the STB with specific rejection reasons and alternative processing instructions in the response message. Although this increases message complexity slightly, it enables the STB to autonomously determine appropriate follow-up actions (such as selecting an alternative channel or retrying after a specified time), thereby significantly improving switching processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback message acts as an intermediary information carrier that bridges the gap between resource constraints and STB decision-making. By embedding structured feedback information including rejection reasons and alternative options, the system enables efficient processing without requiring complex real-time server intervention for each decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8631452B2Channel switching processing method, system, and related devices
Publication Date: 2014.01.14 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US8631452B2 patent drawing
  • US8631452B2 patent drawing
  • US8631452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A channel switching processing method, system, and related devices are provided. The method includes: receiving, by a switching server, a channel switching request sent by a receiving end; and when the switching server determines that current switching resource information does not meet a switching condition according to the channel switching request, performing, by the switching server, an exception handling procedure, and sending channel switching instruction information to the receiving end, in which the channel switching instruction information is configured to instruct the receiving end to perform a channel switching operation corresponding to the channel switching instruction information. A channel switching processing system and related devices are also provided. Therefore, the channel switching efficiency may be effectively improved.