Swivel Distractor System for Spine Surgery Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retractor systems in orthopedic spine surgery are bulky, lack maneuverability, and are prone to displacement during procedures, requiring frequent repositioning and compromising surgical access and visibility.

Innovation Solution

A swivel distractor system with a blade portion, flange, and distraction portion, secured to pedicle screws, allowing for adjustable alignment and manual manipulation, forming a rigid construct with a handle and support frame to maintain optimal surgical access and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If table-mounted retractor systems are used, then surgical access is maintained, but the system becomes bulky and loses maneuverability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidbulkiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor system is divided into separate components: a handheld retractor device that can be manually manipulated and a separate support frame system. This segmentation allows the retractor to be small and maneuverable while the support frame provides stability, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor incorporates movable and adjustable components including a movable distraction portion and adjustable arms that can be repositioned during surgery. This dynamic design enables the retractor to adapt to different surgical needs and patient anatomies, improving maneuverability without requiring a bulky fixed structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If handheld retractors are used, then maneuverability is improved, but manual manipulation is required to maintain position

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoidrepositioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor design incorporates counterbalancing mechanisms and a support frame system that offsets the weight and forces applied during manual manipulation. This allows the clinician to maintain position with minimal effort, reducing fatigue and the need for frequent repositioning while preserving handheld maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor includes self-retaining features such as friction-fit connections and adjustable locking mechanisms that maintain position automatically once placed. This self-service capability reduces the need for continuous manual adjustment and minimizes repositioning time while preserving initial placement flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If soft tissue anchored retractors are used, then positioning is achieved, but frequent re-positioning is required when dislodged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition stabilityVSAvoidrepositioning frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor combines multiple retention mechanisms: soft tissue anchoring through the distraction portion, structural support from the adjustable arms, and mechanical locking features. This combination of methods creates redundant stabilization that prevents dislodgement while allowing easy repositioning if needed, resolving the contradiction between reliability and repositioning frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If retractor systems are secured to maintain position, then displacement is reduced, but procedural flexibility may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition stabilityVSAvoidprocedural flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor features dynamically adjustable components including movable distraction portions, adjustable arm lengths and angles, and selectable locking positions. These dynamic features allow the device to be secured stably during surgery while maintaining the ability to reconfigure for different procedural needs, resolving the contradiction between position stability and procedural flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides self-retention and flexibility, minimizing displacement and repositioning needs, enhancing procedural flexibility and maintaining optimal surgical access and visibility by compensating for pedicle screw offsets.

Implementation Method 1

The distraction portion is pivotally coupled to a second end of the blade portion opposite the first end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivotal coupling: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS11020102B2Swivel retractor and rigid connection system for retractors
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 VB SPINE LLC
  • US11020102B2 patent drawing
  • US11020102B2 patent drawing
  • US11020102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A swivel distractor includes a blade portion, a flange, and a distraction portion. The flange extends at an angle from a first end of the blade portion. The distraction portion is pivotally coupled to a second end of the blade portion opposite the first end. The distraction portion may include a first foot that is configured to be received in a head of a first pedicle screw and a second foot that is configured to be received in a head of a second pedicle screw. The second foot may be movable relative to the first foot.