Swivel Microscopy Slide Locking for Nonstandard Slide Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional microscopy slide locking mechanisms lack adaptability, often damaging nonstandard slides and causing misalignment due to limited size accommodation and localized pressure application, and may contaminate samples with protruding labels.

Innovation Solution

A swivel mechanism with a static and dynamic securing element that contacts orthogonal edges of the slide, allowing for adjustable fitting and distributed pressure to secure slides of various sizes without damage, using materials like rubber, wood, and metals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional locking mechanisms are used, then simple structure is maintained, but adaptability to different slide sizes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different slide sizesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism incorporates a dynamic element that can move between locked and unlocked positions, allowing the mechanism to adapt to different slide sizes. The spring-loaded arm dynamically adjusts its position to accommodate various slide dimensions while maintaining secure contact points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism is designed with universal applicability to handle multiple slide sizes (standard, small, large, nonstandard) using the same basic structure. The combination of spring-loaded arms and adjustable contact points provides multi-functionality across different slide types without requiring separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional locking mechanisms with limited contact points are used, then device complexity is reduced, but slide damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslide damageVSAvoidnumber of contact points
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism divides the contact function into multiple separate contact points distributed across different locations on the slide. Instead of concentrating force at one point, the mechanism uses multiple arms that contact different edges and corners, distributing the holding force to prevent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism applies different qualities of contact at different locations - using spring-loaded arms for flexible contact at corners and edges, and flat surfaces for stable contact on larger areas. This local differentiation optimizes both security and damage prevention at each contact zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If traditional locking mechanisms are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability for nonstandard slides deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliability for nonstandard slidesVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded mechanism provides self-adjusting functionality where the spring automatically adjusts the contact pressure and position based on the slide size and shape. The mechanism serves itself by using the slide's own dimensions to determine the appropriate locking configuration, improving reliability without complicating operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-affected harmful factors

If locking mechanisms with protruding elements are used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but sample contamination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample contaminationVSAvoidmechanism design
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design extracts and removes protruding elements that could contact and contaminate the sample area. By using flat, surface-level contact points instead of protruding arms or levers, the mechanism eliminates the source of potential contamination while maintaining the essential locking function through alternative contact geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260043994A1System for microscopy slide locking using a swivel mechanism and method of use thereof
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 PRAMANA INC
  • US20260043994A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043994A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for microscopy slide locking include a stage slot configured to fit a microscopy slide, the stage slot including a first corner and a second corner diagonally across the first corner, a static securing element disposed at the first corner and configured to contact a microscopy slide at a first pair of its orthogonal, intersecting edges, and a dynamic securing element disposed at the second corner and configured to contact the microscopy slide at a second pair of its orthogonal, intersecting edges diagonally opposite the first pair of its orthogonal, intersecting edges, wherein the dynamic securing element includes a translating portion configured to slide in a translational direction between a proximal position and a distal position and a rotating portion rotationally connected to the translating portion and configured to rotate around an axis of rotation normal to a face of the microscopy slide and the translational direction.