Swivel Wheel Locking Assembly for Automatic Caster Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current caster wheel locking mechanisms on lawn mowers and other equipment require manual engagement by the user, which can be unsafe and inefficient, leading to user strain and reduced productivity during frequent wheel locking and unlocking operations.

Innovation Solution

A wheel locking apparatus with a housing member, actuating means, and locking arms that can be electronically controlled to engage and disengage caster wheels, using a biasing mechanism to maintain pressure against the wheel assembly flange, allowing for automatic locking and unlocking without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual engagement of caster wheel locking mechanisms is used, then the structure remains simple, but user safety deteriorates and operation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism automatically engages and disengages the caster wheels without requiring manual intervention. The system uses sensors to detect when the equipment is moving versus stationary, and automatically controls the locking arms to lock during movement (preventing unwanted swiveling) and unlock when stationary (allowing easy positioning), thereby eliminating safety risks associated with manual operation while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical manual locking with an automated system that uses electrical actuators and control logic. The actuating means (electrical motor or solenoid) replaces manual user force, and the control system replaces manual decision-making, thereby improving safety while the overall mechanical structure remains relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If frequent manual locking and unlocking operations are performed, then wheel position control is achieved, but user strain increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel locking operation easeVSAvoidequipment operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic locking and unlocking based on detected operational conditions, eliminating the need for users to manually operate the locking mechanism during equipment use. This reduces user strain and allows continuous operation without stopping, thereby improving productivity while maintaining ease of wheel position control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism proactively engages before unwanted movement or swiveling can occur during equipment operation, and disengages in advance when positioning is needed. This preliminary action prevents operational interruptions and maintains continuous productivity while ensuring proper wheel control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If caster wheels are locked during turning operations, then straight cutting stability is improved, but maneuverability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting path stabilityVSAvoidequipment maneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism dynamically adjusts its state based on real-time operational conditions detected by sensors. During straight cutting operations, the system locks the caster wheels to maintain stability and prevent sideways sliding. During turning operations, the system automatically unlocks the wheels to enable maneuverability. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by providing both stability and maneuverability at appropriate times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to detect equipment motion state (moving vs. stationary, turning vs. straight) and feeds this information back to the control mechanism, which automatically adjusts the locking state accordingly. This feedback loop ensures the locking mechanism provides stability during straight cutting while enabling maneuverability during turns, resolving the contradiction between these two requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If manual locking engagement is required during equipment operation, then simple control is maintained, but operational continuity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system operates autonomously without requiring user intervention during equipment operation. The automated sensing and actuation maintain operational continuity by preventing unwanted wheel movement during operation while enabling easy positioning when needed, thereby improving productivity without significantly increasing control system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical locking operations with an automated electrical actuation system controlled by simple logic based on sensor input. This substitution maintains relatively simple overall control while eliminating the need for operational stops, thereby improving continuity without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety and efficiency by enabling seamless caster wheel locking and unlocking operations, reducing user strain and improving productivity by allowing continuous operation without stopping the equipment.

Implementation Method 1

The biasing means can be configured to allow the locking pin portion to move from a first position to a second position and maintain a pressure against a flange wall of a wheel assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring pressure: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12545051B2Swivel wheel locking system and method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 STEEL GREEN MFG LLC
  • US12545051B2 patent drawing
  • US12545051B2 patent drawing
  • US12545051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wheel locking apparatus for locking the movement of a wheel assembly, said apparatus including an actuating means and a locking assembly. The locking assembly can include at least one locking arm. The actuating means can be configured to extend a locking arm from a first position to a second position. The locking arm is actuated into the second position to engage an aperture of the wheel assembly thereby locking the wheel assemblies. A locking arm having a locking pin portion that can be located at the second end of the locking arm. The locking pin portion can have a cavity wherein a portion of the locking arm fits within the locking pin portion. A biasing means can be located within the cavity and allow the locking pin position to move along a linear axis when a compressive force is applied to the end of the locking pin portion.