Symbol Level Beam Sweeping Configuration Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in reducing beam indication latency, particularly in symbol level beam sweeping capabilities, which affect the efficiency of synchronization signal block measurements and energy per resource element offset determination between synchronization symbols and physical broadcast channels.

Innovation Solution

Implementing symbol level beam sweeping capability reporting and configuration between user equipment (UE) and base stations, allowing for reduced latency by enabling multiple beams for synchronization signal block measurements and providing energy per resource element offset indications to optimize beam alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional beam sweeping configuration is used, then system compatibility is maintained, but beam indication latency is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam indication latencyVSAvoidbeam sweeping configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam sweeping process into multiple stages: capability reporting phase, configuration phase, and execution phase. By dividing the complex beam indication process into manageable segments with specific timing requirements, the system reduces overall latency while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized interfaces between segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary capability reporting by the UE before actual beam indication is needed. The UE reports its beam sweeping capabilities and preferences in advance, allowing the network to pre-configure appropriate parameters. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time negotiations during beam indication, significantly reducing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple beams are used for synchronization signal block measurements, then measurement accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization signal block measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic beam sweeping where the UE systematically measures multiple beams in a structured sequence rather than attempting all measurements simultaneously. The periodic action allows the UE to complete measurements across multiple beams within defined time intervals, improving accuracy while managing processing time through predictable measurement cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the UE reports measurement results for different beams back to the network. Based on this feedback, the network can dynamically adjust which beams need further measurement and prioritize measurements that yield the most accurate results fastest, optimizing the balance between measurement precision and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If energy per resource element offset is determined for each beam, then beam alignment precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam alignment precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity for offset determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by determining energy per resource element offsets individually for each beam based on its specific characteristics and measurement conditions. Each beam receives customized offset determination tailored to its local measurement results rather than applying a uniform approach, improving alignment precision while managing computational complexity through targeted processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting the offset determination methodology based on beam-specific parameters such as signal strength, interference levels, and measurement accuracy requirements. By changing the computational approach dynamically according to beam characteristics, the system achieves high precision alignment while optimizing computational resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20220312400A1Symbol Level Beam Sweeping Configuration
Publication Date: 2022.09.29 APPLE INC
  • US20220312400A1 patent drawing
  • US20220312400A1 patent drawing
  • US20220312400A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and methods for beam indication latency reduction via a symbol level beam sweeping configuration. A base station may receive, from a user equipment device (UE), a report associated with symbol level beam sweeping. The base station may determine a symbol level beam sweeping configuration. The symbol level beam sweeping configuration may be based, at least in part, on the report. The base station may transmit, to the UE, the symbol level beam sweeping configuration.