Sync Mark Detection Using Ratio Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data processing systems face challenges in accurately identifying synchronization marks in data streams due to the dependency on threshold comparisons, which can lead to missed sync marks or incorrect identification if the threshold is too high or too low.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that includes a metric calculation circuit, a metric ratio calculation circuit, and a sync mark found circuit, which compares input data sets with sync mark and preamble patterns using ratio metrics to reliably detect sync marks, reducing the likelihood of misidentification by considering multiple subsets and offsets of the patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a threshold comparison approach is used to identify sync marks, then the detection process is simple, but the accuracy of sync mark identification deteriorates due to missed sync marks or incorrect identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection process complexityVSAvoidsync mark identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sync mark pattern into multiple subsets and compares each subset independently. The metric calculation circuit divides the sync mark pattern into several parts, calculates match metrics for each part separately, and then combines these metrics to make a final sync mark identification decision. This segmentation approach improves accuracy by reducing the impact of errors in any single comparison while maintaining a structured detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a high threshold is selected for sync mark detection, then false positives are reduced, but the detection rate deteriorates causing missed sync marks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive reductionVSAvoidsync mark detection rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic thresholding where the detection threshold is adjusted based on the calculated match metrics from multiple pattern subsets. Rather than using a fixed high threshold that may miss valid sync marks, the system dynamically determines appropriate thresholds based on the actual match quality across different subsets, thereby maintaining both reliability and detection rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the metric calculation results to adjust detection decisions. The match metrics calculated from multiple pattern subsets are fed back into the decision-making process, allowing the system to adaptively determine whether a sync mark is present based on the cumulative evidence from all subsets rather than relying on a single static threshold comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If a low threshold is selected for sync mark detection, then the detection rate is improved, but the accuracy deteriorates causing incorrect sync mark identification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesync mark detection rateVSAvoidsync mark identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the pattern matching into multiple independent subset comparisons, the system can use a lower effective threshold for each subset while maintaining overall accuracy. The combined metrics from multiple subsets provide a more robust basis for identification, reducing false positives even when individual subset thresholds are lower.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the results from multiple pattern subset comparisons to make the final sync mark identification decision. By combining the match metrics from several subsets, the system achieves higher overall accuracy than any single subset comparison could provide, allowing for more confident identification even with lower individual thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Measurement precision

If multiple subsets and offsets of patterns are considered using ratio metrics, then the accuracy of sync mark detection is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesync mark detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into specialized functional blocks: a metric calculation circuit for computing match metrics, a ratio metric calculation circuit for computing ratios between metrics from different subsets, and a sync mark found circuit for making the final decision. This segmentation distributes the computational complexity across dedicated circuits, making the overall system more manageable and implementable despite the sophisticated algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate metric calculations and ratio computations as mediators between the raw pattern comparisons and the final sync mark identification decision. These intermediate steps break down the complex multi-subset comparison process into manageable stages, with each circuit handling a specific aspect of the computation, thereby organizing the complexity in a structured manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8564897B1Systems and methods for enhanced sync mark detection
Publication Date: 2013.10.22 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8564897B1 patent drawing
  • US8564897B1 patent drawing
  • US8564897B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present inventions are related to systems and methods for data processing, and more particularly to systems and methods for detecting patterns in a data stream.