Synchronized App Specification for Automated Test Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software testing solutions are limited by manual test case generation and lack of integration with data and automation frameworks, requiring manual input for application specification and risking errors due to additional effort and versioning.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for generating synchronized test templates and cases using both model and text descriptions, with automated data constraint verification and integration, enabling automated test generation and reducing manual input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual test case generation is used, then test reliability can be maintained through human expertise, but productivity is low and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest case generation speedVSAvoidtest case accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that automatically generates test cases from automated test templates. This intermediary layer bridges the gap between automated template generation and manual verification, allowing machines to handle routine test case creation while humans focus on reviewing and validating critical aspects, thus improving overall productivity without sacrificing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical test case generation with automated electronic generation systems. Automated test templates are generated by computers based on test specifications, eliminating the need for manual writing of test cases. This substitution dramatically increases productivity while maintaining reliability through systematic automated generation processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated test case generation without data integration is used, then productivity increases, but test reliability decreases due to lack of data validation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest case generation speedVSAvoiddata value validity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where generated test cases are automatically validated against data constraints and specifications. The system provides feedback loops that verify data values meet required criteria before test cases are finalized, ensuring both high productivity through automation and high reliability through systematic validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining data constraints, validation rules, and test templates before actual test case generation. This preliminary setup ensures that when automated test cases are generated, they inherently comply with data validity requirements, eliminating the need for post-generation validation and maintaining both speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple versions of application specification are maintained, then adaptability improves for different testing scenarios, but device complexity increases due to version management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecification flexibilityVSAvoidspecification management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the application specification dynamic and adaptable through automated template generation that can be configured for different testing scenarios. Instead of maintaining multiple static specification versions, the system dynamically generates appropriate test templates based on input parameters, achieving versatility without the complexity of managing multiple fixed versions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the application specification into modular automated test templates that can be independently configured and combined. This segmentation allows the system to handle different testing scenarios by assembling appropriate template combinations rather than maintaining entirely separate specification documents, reducing overall complexity while preserving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If manual user input is required for application specification, then ease of operation is maintained through direct user control, but loss of time increases due to additional manual effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input simplicityVSAvoidspecification entry time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service functionality where the system automatically generates test templates and validates data constraints without requiring extensive manual user input. The automated system serves itself by generating appropriate test specifications based on input parameters, dramatically reducing the time users would otherwise spend on manual specification entry while maintaining ease of operation through automated assistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250370914A1Testing Platform with Synchronized Application Specification Description
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 CONFORMIQ HOLDING LLC
  • US20250370914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370914A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370914A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method automatically generates a synchronized model based on a received text description and a synchronized text description based on a received model. The method comprises receiving application requirements input describing at least one desired application feature, the application requirements input comprising at least one of a model and a text description. A synchronized model is generated based on received text description. A synchronized text description is generated based on a received model. The synchronized model and synchronized text description both describe the same at least one desired application feature. In one embodiment, received test data is integrated with the synchronized model and the synchronized text description. At least one test is generated based on the synchronized model, the synchronized text description, and the integrated test data.