Synchronized Perforating Stations for High-Speed Web Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cutting systems for moving webs at high speeds suffer from high wear rates and poor perforation quality due to impact forces, leading to frequent blade changes and inconsistent perforation lines, which disrupts the manufacturing process and product quality.

Innovation Solution

A perforating apparatus with two or more synchronized perforating stations, each comprising a rotating knife roll and an anvil, driven by separate motors with coordinated speed control to maintain a non-zero speed difference, allowing for efficient and reliable cutting of a moving web at high speeds with reduced vibrational energy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional single perforating station is used, then device complexity is low, but productivity is insufficient for high web speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperforation rateVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple independent perforating stations (first, second, and optionally third stations), each with its own knife roll and anvil assembly. This segmentation allows each station to operate independently at high speed while distributing the total perforation load across multiple units, achieving high productivity without requiring a single overly complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If high interference between knife and anvil blades is used, then cutting force is sufficient, but wear rate increases requiring frequent blade changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoidblade durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple perforating stations that operate in a periodic, coordinated manner. By distributing cutting actions across multiple stations rather than concentrating all cutting force in a single knife-anvil interface, the interference and wear on individual blades are reduced while maintaining sufficient cutting force through the cumulative effect of multiple stations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If small interference between knife and anvil blades is used, then wear is reduced, but perforation quality deteriorates due to vibrations and setup variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade durabilityVSAvoidperforation line quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple perforating stations are merged into a single coordinated system that works in unison. The combined output of multiple stations produces a consistent, high-quality perforation line that is more reliable than what a single station could achieve, while allowing each station to operate with lower interference settings that reduce wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If conventional single perforating station is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but productivity is insufficient at high web speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpacts per minuteVSAvoidsystem control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the operation of multiple perforating stations and automatically adjust their coordination. This feedback control maintains ease of operation by handling the complexity of synchronizing multiple stations automatically, while still achieving the high productivity required for high web speed applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

5Manufacturing precision

If conventional single perforating station is used, then device complexity is low, but the system cannot maintain consistent perforation quality at high speeds due to impact forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperforation line consistencyVSAvoidnumber of perforating stations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic coordination between multiple perforating stations, where the operation of each station is adjusted in real-time based on the overall system requirements. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain consistent perforation quality at high speeds by distributing and coordinating the impact forces across multiple stations, preventing the vibrations and variations that plague single-station systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high perforation rates exceeding 7,000 impacts per minute with low vibrational energy and consistent perforation lines, reducing maintenance needs and improving web cutting reliability and quality.

Implementation Method 1

there is some non-zero difference between V1 and VW

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpeed difference:

Implementation Method 2

with low vibrational energy and without damaging the web

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibrational energy reduction: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS9914234B2Multilateral cutter
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 KIMBERLY CLARK WORLDWIDE INC
  • US9914234B2 patent drawing
  • US9914234B2 patent drawing
  • US9914234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a perforating station comprising two or more discrete perforating stations, the stations synchronized with one another to cut a line of perforations across a web, such as a web of tissue paper, moving at high speeds. By providing two or more synchronized perforating stations the perforating station may increase the number of impacts per minute compared to prior art perforating devices.