Synchronized Radar Sensor System for Bistatic Object Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radar sensors for advanced driver assistance and automated driving require high processing power and memory due to extensive internal data processing, and struggle with wave propagation issues that mask less reflective objects, particularly in parking scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A radar sensor system comprising at least two radar sensors with synchronized transmission and reception, allowing for bistatic evaluation by overlapping detection ranges and compensating for frequency offsets to enhance object classification, particularly in short-range applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If extensive internal data processing is performed in radar sensors, then object-level data is provided for further analysis, but processing power and memory capacity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing power and memory capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the data processing task between multiple radar sensors and a central evaluation device. Each sensor performs initial signal processing and transmits raw or partially processed data, while the central evaluation device performs the computationally intensive object classification and analysis. This segmentation allows sensors to remain relatively simple while achieving sophisticated object-level recognition through distributed processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Length of stationary object

If wave propagation is used for detection, then detection range is extended, but less reflective objects are masked by strong reflections from walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidobject detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple radar sensors as intermediaries to detect objects that would otherwise be masked. By positioning sensors at different locations and evaluating their combined data, the system can identify less reflective objects (such as posts) that are obscured by strong reflections from walls in single-sensor configurations. The multiple sensors provide complementary viewing angles that reveal objects hidden from any single sensor's perspective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple radar sensors are used to improve detection, then object classification is enhanced, but system complexity and synchronization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject classification accuracyVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms to manage synchronization between multiple radar sensors. The central evaluation device coordinates the operation of individual sensors, adjusting their timing and parameters based on detected conditions and performance feedback. This allows the system to maintain optimal synchronization without requiring overly complex predetermined coordination protocols, as the system adapts its synchronization based on actual operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables improved object detection and classification with reduced computational requirements, optimizing synchronization and minimizing errors for accurate distance estimation in parking and similar scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

Vehicles with advanced driver assistance or automated driving functions are increasingly being equipped with radar sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 2

walls reflect strongly and thus less reflective objects, such as posts, are masked

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

Bistastatic analyses in connection with ultrasound are known. These involve evaluating the time-of-flight differences between acoustic and electrical signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP3803444B1Radar sensor system
Publication Date: 2025.10.29 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3803444B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3803444B1 patent drawing
  • EP3803444B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a radar sensor system (100) having: - at least two radar sensors (10, 20) each having at least one transmitter and at least one receiver, wherein detection regions of the two radar sensors (10, 20) at least partly overlap, wherein the two radar sensors (10, 20) are spaced apart in a defined manner, wherein transmitted signals from the two radar sensors (10, 20) can be synchronised in such a way that radiation emitted by a radar sensor (10, 20) and reflected by an object (200), which radiation has been emitted by the respective other radar sensor (10, 20), can be evaluated by means of an evaluation device (30).