Synchronous Common Coupling for Power Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-level cascaded power management systems, such as Cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) topology, are costly, complex, and unreliable due to limitations in switching frequency, dielectric, and thermal capability, and require complicated hardware and cable assemblies, making them unsuitable for efficient power flow control in renewable energy systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of synchronous common coupling technology, which connects power between electrically isolated stacks while maintaining electrical isolation, allowing for flexible and efficient power management by linking power flow between AC/DC sources and loads, reducing part count and losses, and enabling true power routing capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional multi-level cascaded power management systems (CHB topology) are used, then power flow control capability is provided, but the system becomes costly, complex, and unreliable with limited switching frequency and thermal capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower flow control capabilityVSAvoidhardware and cable assemblies complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple electrically isolated stacks, each capable of independent operation. These stacks are connected through a synchronous common coupling mechanism that allows power exchange while maintaining electrical isolation. This segmentation reduces the complexity of individual components while maintaining overall system functionality and enabling modular scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A synchronous common coupling mechanism is introduced as an intermediary between electrically isolated stacks. This coupling enables power flow control and exchange between stacks without requiring direct electrical connection, thereby reducing hardware complexity and cable assemblies while maintaining system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If electrically isolated stacks are connected through synchronous common coupling, then power flow control efficiency is enhanced and part count is reduced, but maintaining electrical isolation while enabling power exchange increases control complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower flow control efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors power flow, voltage, and current conditions across all stacks and adjusts the synchronous common coupling operation accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables efficient power flow control while maintaining electrical isolation, as the system dynamically responds to changing conditions without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters such as switching frequency, voltage levels, and coupling strength to optimize power flow efficiency. By changing these parameters in response to system conditions, the control system achieves high productivity while managing complexity through standardized control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If conventional CHB topology is used, then power management is provided, but switching frequency limitations and thermal capability constraints reduce system reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower management capabilityVSAvoidsystem resiliency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the power management system into multiple electrically isolated stacks improves reliability through redundancy. If one stack experiences failures due to switching frequency limitations or thermal issues, other stacks can continue operating independently, maintaining overall system power management capability while enhancing resiliency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly reduces costs, complexity, and part count, enhances efficiency, and improves resiliency, enabling flexible power flow control indifferent to voltage magnitude, frequency, and phase, while maintaining electrical isolation, thus addressing the limitations of traditional CHB topology.

Implementation Method 1

synchronous common coupling technology, which connects power between electrically isolated stacks while maintaining electrical isolation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10811988B2Power management utilizing synchronous common coupling
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 RESILIENT POWER SYST LLC
  • US10811988B2 patent drawing
  • US10811988B2 patent drawing
  • US10811988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Power management apparatuses and systems utilizing synchronous common coupling. A power management apparatus may include a plurality of ports and a plurality of electrically isolated stacks connected through a synchronous common coupling. Each electrically isolated stack may include a plurality of cascaded stages and may be connected to a source or load through one of the plurality of ports. The synchronous common coupling connects only power between each of the plurality of electrically isolated stacks and is configured to maintain electrical isolation for each of the plurality of stages in the plurality of electrically isolated stacks.