Synchronous Context Alignments for Language Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current language learning tools fail to effectively synchronize text with vocalizations, particularly in multi-sensory experiences, and lack control over alignment of international texts in proportional fonts, limiting interactive and social learning experiences.

Innovation Solution

A system that aligns text with vocalizations, allowing for independent control of text and context alignment, enabling synchronized visual, auditory, and tactile experiences, and supports editing of text and context in real-time within a WYSIWYG interface, using technologies like Text-To-Speech and phonetic transcriptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If text is synchronized with vocalizations using known methods, then some contextual alignment is achieved, but the synchronization is imperfect and lacks multi-sensory engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization precisionVSAvoidmulti-sensory engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides text into syllabic segments and aligns each segment with corresponding audio timing markers. This segmentation allows precise synchronization of visual text with auditory vocalizations, creating accurate multi-sensory alignment without requiring complex manual coordination of entire text blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines visual text display, auditory audio playback, and tactile touchscreen interaction into a unified synchronized experience. By merging these sensory modalities and coordinating them through timing markers, the system creates an integrated multi-sensory learning environment that improves engagement while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Shape

If international texts are aligned in proportional fonts, then visual appeal is improved, but alignment control becomes unpredictable across different computing environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual appealVSAvoidalignment consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal alignment system that works across different font types (proportional and monospace), character sets, and computing environments. By creating font-agnostic alignment markers and using relative positioning based on character counts rather than absolute measurements, the system maintains reliable alignment consistency while supporting visual appeal through proportional fonts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If text alignment is controlled in editable textareas, then direct editing capability is achieved, but alignment breaks when text is resized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect editing capabilityVSAvoidalignment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic alignment markers that automatically recalculate and reposition themselves when text is edited or resized. Rather than using fixed static positions, the alignment system dynamically adjusts marker locations based on the current text content and dimensions, maintaining alignment stability while preserving direct editing capability in WYSIWYG interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple supplemental texts are independently aligned with the same text, then contextual variety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual varietyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces alignment markers and timing markers as intermediary elements that mediate between multiple supplemental texts and the primary text. These markers serve as standardized interface points that simplify the alignment process, allowing multiple contexts (translations, transcriptions, annotations) to be independently aligned with the same primary text without requiring complex direct coordination between all elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9916295B1Synchronous context alignments
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 CRAWFORD RICHARD HENRY DANA
  • US9916295B1 patent drawing
  • US9916295B1 patent drawing
  • US9916295B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus to align contexts with text. Multiple versions within separate forms of context are controlled; all contexts are controlled in independent alignment with parts in text. Plain text syllables are synchronized with audio vocalization playback with timings applied in context. Precise synchronization is controlled within a multi-touch tap process. Same-language restatements, translations, linguistic alignment “ties” and tags are controlled in contexts. Depictions and vocalizations of text and parts in text are controlled within contexts and sorted within tiered carousels. Toggle controls quickly access separate contexts. Independent alignments between multiple contexts and parts in text are controlled and dynamically adjusted in real-time. Text and contexts in multiple writing systems, styles and sizes are aligned and edited within WYSIWYG textarea. Context alignment controls are applied within a collaborative social framework.