Synchronous IoT Transfer Network for Collision-Resilient Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of IoT devices with disparate communication protocols leads to network congestion, packet collisions, reduced bandwidth, and performance issues, particularly in high assurance networks, and the failure of network components complicates network stability.

Innovation Solution

A multiple-input synchronous transfer (MIST) network is implemented, utilizing a master cell to synchronize and optimize communication between network cells, allowing for self-forming, self-healing, and self-optimizing network configurations that reduce packet collisions and allocate bandwidth efficiently, while maintaining connectivity even with failed components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of IoT devices in the network increases, then network coverage and connectivity are improved, but network congestion and packet collisions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverageVSAvoidnetwork performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is divided into multiple cells, each managed by a master device that controls communication within its cell. This segmentation allows the network to scale by adding more cells rather than increasing load on a single network, thereby maintaining performance while expanding coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Master devices act as intermediaries between IoT devices and the central server. They manage local communication, synchronize data transmission, and filter traffic, reducing packet collisions and congestion on the central network while enabling broader device connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If devices communicate using disparate protocols, then device compatibility and adaptability are improved, but packet collisions and network congestion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compatibilityVSAvoidpacket collisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The master device serves multiple functions: it acts as a protocol translator, traffic controller, and synchronization coordinator. This multi-functionality allows devices with disparate protocols to communicate seamlessly while the master manages packet transmission to prevent collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The master device mediates communication between devices using different protocols and the central server. It standardizes data formats and coordinates transmission timing, enabling protocol diversity without generating packet collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If network components fail, then system robustness is tested, but network stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork robustnessVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes backup master devices and redundant communication paths within each cell. When a master device fails, a backup master is already positioned to take over, preventing network instability without requiring complex real-time reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network performs self-healing through automatic master device selection and reconfiguration. When a master fails, remaining devices in the cell autonomously elect a new master from available candidates, maintaining network stability without external intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If synchronous transfer is implemented, then bandwidth allocation is optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth allocationVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Synchronization functionality is merged into the master device role rather than being implemented in each IoT device. The master handles timing coordination and bandwidth allocation for all devices in its cell, simplifying individual device complexity while achieving optimized synchronous transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The master device acts as an intermediary that centralizes synchronization logic. It manages timing and bandwidth allocation for multiple devices, achieving efficient synchronous transfer without requiring complex synchronization capabilities in each individual device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12489532B2Optimization of a multiple-input synchronous transfer network
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 C LAN WIRELESS
  • US12489532B2 patent drawing
  • US12489532B2 patent drawing
  • US12489532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for wireless communication is provided. In some implementations, the method includes receiving, by a first device, a first packet from a second device in a network. The method further includes comparing, by the first device, a first received signal strength of the first packet to a second received signal strength of a second packet associated with a third device, the third device associated with the first device in the network. The method further includes transmitting, by the first device and based on to the comparing, a third packet to the second device, the third packet indicating a disassociation of the first device with the third device and an association of the first device with the second device.