Two-Step Syngas Production via Segmented Pyrolysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for producing syngas from organic materials suffer from low energy efficiency, contamination issues, equipment corrosion, and inability to separate pyrolysis and gasification gases, leading to suboptimal product quality and energy waste.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-step process where thermolysis is conducted at controlled temperatures in a low-oxygen atmosphere, followed by gasification at high temperatures, with enthalpy recovery and specific purification steps to produce high-quality syngas, including separation of thermolysis and gasification gases to minimize contamination and maximize energy reuse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pyrolysis and gasification are conducted in the same chamber, then the process is simpler, but the temperature and chemical composition cannot be precisely controlled, leading to unfavorable gas composition with tars, nitrogen oxides, and dioxins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidtemperature and composition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the gasification process into two separate chambers: a pyrolysis chamber for thermal decomposition and a gasification chamber for conversion of char to syngas. This segmentation allows independent control of temperature and chemical composition in each chamber, resolving the contradiction between process simplicity and precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the gasification step from the pyrolysis chamber and performs it in a separate gasification chamber. This extraction enables precise control over the gasification environment while maintaining the pyrolysis process conditions, thereby achieving favorable gas composition without excessive process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional gasification methods are used, then the process is straightforward, but the syngas has low energy with net calorific value below 5 MJ/Nm3

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidsyngas energy content
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By separating pyrolysis and gasification into distinct chambers, the invention optimizes each stage to maximize syngas quality. The gasification chamber operates under controlled conditions to produce high-calorific-value syngas, resolving the contradiction between process simplicity and energy content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes key operational parameters including operating at atmospheric pressure, controlling gas flow rates, and maintaining specific temperature ranges in the gasification chamber. These parameter changes enable production of syngas with net calorific value exceeding 8 MJ/Nm3 while keeping the process relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If rapid pyrolysis by fluidisation is used, then the product gas quality is much better, but the installation becomes complex, expensive and greedy of energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct gas qualityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a simple two-chamber configuration without complex fluidisation systems. The pyrolysis chamber handles thermal decomposition while the gasification chamber processes the char, achieving good gas quality through straightforward design rather than complex fluidised bed technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs simple, inexpensive chamber designs that can be easily constructed and maintained. Rather than investing in complex, expensive fluidisation equipment, the system uses basic refractory-lined chambers that achieve the desired gas quality at lower capital and operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If rapid pyrolysis by fluidisation is used, then instantaneous pyrolysis and gasification occur, but the enthalpy of the gases produced cannot be exploited, resulting in energy loss exceeding 20%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction speedVSAvoidenthalpy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs pyrolysis first in the pyrolysis chamber, then uses the resulting char as feedstock for the gasification chamber. This preliminary action allows the system to capture and utilize the enthalpy of gases produced in each stage, preventing the energy losses associated with instantaneous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention maintains continuous operation where the output of one chamber becomes the input of the next. The char from pyrolysis continuously feeds the gasification chamber, and the enthalpy of produced gases is continuously utilized, ensuring no energy is wasted and maintaining high productivity throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Device complexity

If thermolysis gas is not purified before gasification, then the process is simpler, but undesirable elements cause corrosion, abrasion and fouling of equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidequipment corrosion and fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces a purification stage between pyrolysis and gasification chambers. This segmentation allows removal of tar and other condensable substances that would otherwise cause equipment corrosion and fouling, while maintaining overall process simplicity through straightforward filtration and washing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves syngas with a higher net calorific value (>8 MJ/Nm3), reduced tar content, and improved equipment lifespan by optimizing temperature control and purification, enhancing energy efficiency and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

If this organic material is subjected to a temperature above 150° in the absence of oxygen, it then undergoes a transformation known as pyrolysis, which breaks down the carbon molecules by rupture of the covalent bonds.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

The char produced by pyrolysis also undergoes gasification by the association of carbon with oxygen and hydrogen, which produces carbon monoxide, dihydrogen and methane under ideal conditions. This reaction is endothermic and requires a specific addition of heat.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 3

Traditionally, this addition is provided by a combustion reaction in the air produced in the process.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 4

the thermolysis gas obtained during the first step is used in a step of purification of the undesirable elements, and more than 35% of the energy necessary for the first step is supplied by a step of recovery of the enthalpy of the product gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10844301B2Method for producing a synthesis gas
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 HAFFNER ENERGY
  • US10844301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a synthesis gas from an organic material with a moisture content of less than 20%. A first step for carrying out the thermolysis of the organic material and a second, separate step for the gasification (ii) of the thermolysed organic material. The thermolysis step is carried out by increasing the temperature of the raw material up to an end temperature higher than 150° C. and lower than 1400° C.; —the thermolysis step (i) is carried out in a controlled gas atmosphere in which the quantity of oxygen supplied is less than 20% of the quantity of oxygen required for the stoichiometric combustion of the organic raw material; —the thermolysis gas obtained in the thermolysis step is conveyed to a purification step (iii) for removing undesirable elements.