Synchronous Reluctance Rotor Barriers for Lower Torque Ripple

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The use of arc-shaped magnets in permanent magnet-assisted synchronous reluctance motors increases manufacturing costs and assembly difficulty, limits the expansion angle between magnetic barriers and magnetic conduction segments, and sacrifices output torque.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design with magnetic barrier groups featuring symmetrical magnetic barriers protruding radially inward, comprising perpendicular and outward extending portions, allows for the use of rectangular magnets, simplifying assembly and enhancing output torque.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If arc-shaped magnets are used in the magnetic barrier, then torque ripple is reduced, but manufacturing cost increases and assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque rippleVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and assembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic barrier is designed with an asymmetric cross-sectional shape where the first portion (adjacent to magnetic conduction segment) has a different width than the second portion (adjacent to q-axis). This asymmetric design allows the use of simple rectangular magnets while achieving the same torque ripple reduction effect that would otherwise require complex arc-shaped magnets, thereby simplifying manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic barrier is divided into two distinct portions with different dimensions: the first portion adjacent to the magnetic conduction segment and the second portion adjacent to the q-axis. By optimizing the local geometry of each portion independently, the design achieves effective torque ripple reduction while accommodating simple rectangular magnets, thus resolving the contradiction between performance and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If arc-shaped magnets are used in the magnetic barrier, then torque ripple is reduced, but assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque rippleVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric cross-sectional shape of the magnetic barrier with its two distinct portions allows rectangular magnets to be easily assembled while achieving torque ripple reduction. The specific geometric configuration guides the assembly process and simplifies magnet placement compared to arc-shaped designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the expansion angle between magnetic barrier and magnetic conduction segment is limited, then torque ripple is reduced, but output torque is sacrificed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque rippleVSAvoidoutput torque
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic barrier's first portion adjacent to the magnetic conduction segment is designed with an optimized width that balances torque ripple reduction and output torque maintenance. The second portion adjacent to the q-axis has a different width to maintain proper magnetic flux paths. This local optimization of each portion's dimensions achieves both goals simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design optimizes specific geometric parameters including the width of the first portion (adjacent to magnetic conduction segment) and the width of the second portion (adjacent to q-axis), as well as the expansion angle. By carefully selecting these parameters within specific ranges, the design achieves torque ripple reduction while maintaining or improving output torque through enhanced magnetic flux distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces torque ripple and improves output torque by using symmetrical magnetic barriers with specific angular relationships, facilitating easier magnet assembly and increasing total reluctance torque.

Implementation Method 1

A rotor portion of each pole consists of a plurality of magnetic conduction segments and a magnetic barrier, and each pole in the rotor has a position with minimum reluctance (d-axis) and a position with maximum reluctance (q-axis). When a stator winding is energized, the magnetic flux will attempt to pass in a direction where the reluctance in the rotor is minimum, causing the rotor to rotate at a synchronous speed.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic reluctance: Magnetic Reluctance

Implementation Method 2

In the synchronous reluctance motor, magnets are sometimes disposed in the magnetic barrier, forming a permanent magnet-assisted synchronous reluctance motor (usually referred to as PMA-SynRM), in order to improve the efficiency, etc.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermanent magnet: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS12587049B2Synchronous reluctance motor with magnetic flux barriers
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 NIDEC CORP(JP)
  • US12587049B2 patent drawing
  • US12587049B2 patent drawing
  • US12587049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A synchronous reluctance motor includes magnetic barriers in each magnetic barrier group of a rotor core, each having a shape which protrudes toward a radial inner side and is symmetrical about a q-axis. A portion closer to a circumferential side than the q-axis includes a first portion extending perpendicular to the q-axis and a second portion extending farther toward the circumferential side from a circumferential side of the first portion and radially outward, and the first portions of the magnetic barriers in each magnetic barrier group have the same radial dimension. The first portions of the magnetic barriers other than the radial outermost magnetic barrier have the same circumferential dimension, which is the same as or twice a circumferential dimension of the first portion of the radial outermost magnetic barrier.