Frequency Synthesizer Dual-Clock Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Frequency synthesizers face limitations in generating a wide frequency range due to the fixed hardware of analog PLLs and dividers, leading to high power consumption, misalignment issues, and lengthy factory test times, especially when dealing with low common frequencies and long divider chains.

Innovation Solution

A frequency synthesizer architecture using two clocks with a fixed frequency ratio, where a low-frequency clock is used for counting and decoding, and a higher-frequency clock outputs the results, allowing for flexible division ratios, reduced power consumption, and quicker alignment, implemented with a counter, adder, decoder, and parallel-serial converter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If counters and dividers are used to extend frequency range, then output frequency range is increased, but power consumption increases due to high clock rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput frequency rangeVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the frequency synthesis function into two separate modules: a VCO module that generates high-frequency clock signals, and a counter module that performs division operations. By separating these functions, the counter operates at lower frequencies while the VCO handles high-frequency generation, thus reducing overall power consumption while maintaining extended frequency range capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a buffer circuit as an intermediary between the VCO output and the counter input. This buffer isolates the high-frequency VCO signal from the counter, allowing the counter to operate at reduced frequencies while still achieving the desired output frequency range through the combination of VCO multiplication and counter division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed hardware dividers are implemented in silicon, then manufacturing is simplified, but adaptability to different frequency requirements is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware implementationVSAvoidfrequency range flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements programmable counters with configurable division ratios, replacing fixed hardware dividers. These dynamic counters can be programmed through control registers to achieve different division ratios, allowing the same hardware to adapt to various frequency requirements while maintaining the benefits of integrated silicon implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses control registers and decoding logic to dynamically change the division ratio parameter of the counters. By modifying the programmed values in these registers, the system can adapt to different frequency requirements without hardware changes, combining ease of manufacture with frequency range flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If long divider chains are used to achieve high division ratios, then frequency range is extended, but factory test time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedivision ratio capabilityVSAvoidfactory test time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves high division ratios by cascading multiple counter modules rather than using a single long divider chain. Each counter module can be independently tested and calibrated, significantly reducing factory test time compared to testing a single lengthy divider chain, while still achieving the required overall division ratio through the series connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple analog PLLs are started simultaneously, then frequency synthesis is achieved, but output misalignment occurs due to different locking trajectories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-PLL frequency synthesisVSAvoidoutput alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a startup control mechanism that sequentially enables multiple PLLs rather than starting them simultaneously. By controlling the enable timing of each PLL through control registers, the system ensures that all PLLs lock to their respective frequencies in a controlled sequence, preventing output misalignment while maintaining the capability for multi-PLL frequency synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2020629B1Flexible waveform generator with extended range capability
Publication Date: 2014.08.20 MICROSEMI SEMICON
  • EP2020629B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2020629B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP2020629B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

A frequency synthesizer includes a first clock running at a frequency fCLK1, a second clock running at a frequency fCLK2, wherein frequency fCLK2 is higher than frequency fCLK1, the frequencies having a fixed ratio QFB = fCLK2/ fCLK1; and a counter driven by the first clock. A decoder for produces QFB output values in parallel for each cycle of the first clock, and parallel-serial converter serially outputs these QFB output values at the frequency of the second clock.