AI-Guided Synthetic Biology Optimization for Batch-Normalized Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Synthetic biology processes are currently lab-driven, capital intensive, and uncertain, with high costs and inefficiencies due to the lack of integration of diverse data formats and sources, leading to systemic variations and batch effects.

Innovation Solution

An AI-guided synthetic biology platform that integrates and normalizes biologic data from multiple sources, applies machine learning models to generate predictive designs, and ensures data quality through normalization and quality control processes, using techniques like Bayesian statistical modeling and multi-modal data integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If diverse data formats and sources are integrated, then data comprehensiveness is improved, but data standardization and quality control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata standardization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (data normalization and standardization module) that mediates between diverse data sources and the predictive modeling system. This intermediary converts various data formats into a unified structure, enabling comprehensive data integration without increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by transforming data from different formats and sources into a standardized parameter structure. This allows the system to maintain data comprehensiveness while working with uniform parameters that are compatible with predictive models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If batch-specific systemic variation is minimized through normalization, then predictive model accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive model accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing data normalization and batch effect correction before predictive modeling. This preprocessing step eliminates the need for repeated corrections during model training and validation, ultimately reducing total processing time while improving model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or iterative normalization processes with automated computational algorithms that efficiently correct batch effects. This substitution reduces processing time while maintaining or improving the precision of predictive models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If AI and machine learning methods are applied to biologic data, then innovation speed and efficiency are improved, but computational costs and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinnovation speedVSAvoidcomputational infrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational workflow into distinct modules: data preprocessing, normalization, feature extraction, and predictive modeling. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and enables distributed computing, reducing the computational burden on any single system while maintaining high innovation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If multi-modal data integration is implemented, then predictive model robustness is improved, but data processing complexity and quality control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive model robustnessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal data processing framework that handles multiple data modalities (genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, phenotypic) through a single standardized interface. This multi-functional approach improves model robustness by integrating diverse data types while avoiding the need for separate processing pipelines for each modality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024620A1Platforms, systems, and methods for multi-objective optimization and comparative analysis for synthetic biology development
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 X DEVELOPMENT LLC
  • US20260024620A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024620A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024620A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Platforms, systems, and methods for multi-objective optimization and comparative analysis for synthetic biology development. According to one aspect, there is provided an AI-guided analytic platform for development of biologic synthesis processes, comprising: a multi-objective optimization system for performing multi-objective optimizations of the biologic synthesis processes; at least one multi-objective evaluation artificial intelligence model configured to evaluate a biologic product according to each of at least two objectives; and at least one variant evaluation module configured to: generate a set of variants of a biologic parent of the biologic product, and evaluate each variant of the set of variants of the biologic parent using the at least one multi-objective evaluation artificial intelligence model.