Synthetic Chuck Inlay for Planarization Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional self-planarization processes for semiconductor wafers are limited in precision due to the material used for the chuck, leading to significant thickness variations in integrated circuits, which are difficult to correct and result in increased costs and tool downtime, as well as vulnerability to particle contamination.

Innovation Solution

A workpiece planarization arrangement featuring a chuck with a replaceable inlay made of a synthetic material, such as PET, that can be self-planarized under the same conditions as the workpieces, reducing thermal and mechanical differences and allowing for more frequent self-planarization without modifying the machining bit or tool configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional chuck material is used for self-planarization, then the chuck can be planarized to align with the planarization plane, but the precision is limited and total thickness variation exceeds 2 μm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanarization precisionVSAvoidtotal thickness variation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter of the chuck from conventional materials to synthetic materials (such as PET) with specific properties. This material substitution enables the chuck to be planarized under the same conditions as the workpiece without modifying the machining bit, achieving total thickness variation of less than 0.2 μm and significantly improving planarization precision and thickness stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs synthetic composite materials for the chuck that combine the necessary mechanical strength with planarizability. These composite materials allow the chuck to maintain structural integrity while being capable of self-planarization under workpiece planarization conditions, resolving the contradiction between precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If frequent self-planarization is performed with conventional chuck materials, then alignment precision may be improved, but the machining bit must be modified and tool configuration changed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-planarization precisionVSAvoidtool configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the chuck material parameter to synthetic materials, the patent enables the chuck to be planarized under identical conditions as the workpiece. This eliminates the need to modify machining bits or change tool configuration for self-planarization, allowing frequent planarization operations without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If conventional chuck materials are used, then the chuck provides structural support, but it is vulnerable to particle contamination and requires frequent replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechuck structural strengthVSAvoidparticle contamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material properties of the chuck to synthetic materials that possess both the required structural strength and resistance to particle contamination. This material substitution maintains chuck strength while significantly reducing vulnerability to contamination, decreasing maintenance needs and replacement frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional self-planarization processes are used, then the planarization package can be aligned, but significant thickness variations are transferred to subsequent process steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanarization alignmentVSAvoidthickness variation transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the chuck material to synthetic materials planarized under the same conditions as the workpiece, the patent achieves superior planarization alignment with total thickness variation of less than 0.2 μm. This dramatically reduces the thickness variation transferred to subsequent process steps compared to conventional processes that produce variations exceeding 2 μm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10199255B2Method for providing a planarizable workpiece support, a workpiece planarization arrangement, and a chuck
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10199255B2 patent drawing
  • US10199255B2 patent drawing
  • US10199255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to various embodiments, a workpiece planarization arrangement may include: a chuck including at least one portion configured to support one or more workpieces; and a planarization tool configured to planarize the at least one portion of the chuck and to planarize one or more workpieces on the at least one portion of the chuck; wherein the at least one portion of the chuck includes at least one of particles, pores and/or a polymer.