Synthetic Data Classifier for Blood Flow Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for estimating blood flow in patients rely heavily on patient-specific data, which requires a large number of examples for training, is costly, and may not account for outlier conditions due to limited training data availability.

Innovation Solution

A machine-trained classifier is trained using synthetic data, where a computer model is perturbed to generate various examples, and a bench model is altered to measure flow, allowing the classifier to estimate blood flow based on features from medical scan data without relying on patient-specific training data, and accounting for therapeutic alterations and uncertainty.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning is used with patient-specific training data, then the classifier can estimate blood flow accurately, but the cost and time to gather sufficient training data increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood flow estimation accuracyVSAvoidtime to gather training data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses synthetic data generated from computer models as copies of real patient data to train the machine learning classifier. This allows the classifier to learn from numerous examples without requiring actual patient data collection, thereby maintaining accuracy while eliminating the time cost of gathering training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the training data source from real patient data to synthetic data by changing the parameter of data origin. This parameter change enables the system to generate unlimited training examples through computational modeling, resolving the contradiction between needing sufficient training examples and the time required to collect them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If machine learning is used with patient-specific training data, then the classifier can estimate blood flow accurately, but the cost to gather sufficient training data increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblood flow estimation accuracyVSAvoidcost to gather training data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive patient-specific training data with computationally generated synthetic data copies. This copying approach maintains the ability to train accurate classifiers while eliminating the substantial costs associated with recruiting, scanning, and processing real patient data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive synthetic data generated from computer models as a disposable alternative to expensive patient data. These synthetic examples can be generated unlimited times at low computational cost, replacing the need for costly and limited real patient datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If machine learning is used with limited patient-specific training data, then the classifier can be trained quickly, but outlier conditions are less likely to be accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidhandling of outlier conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic training dataset by generating synthetic data with varied parameters that can adapt to represent different patient conditions including outliers. This dynamic generation allows the classifier to be trained on diverse conditions without being limited by the static constraints of available patient data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data diversity by using synthetic data generation to create examples covering a broad range of conditions including rare outliers. This parameter change enables the classifier to learn from diverse scenarios while maintaining fast training speeds, as synthetic data can be generated rapidly with controlled variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240423575A1Data-driven assessment of therapy interventions in medical imaging
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20240423575A1 patent drawing
  • US20240423575A1 patent drawing
  • US20240423575A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In hemodynamic determination in medical imaging, the classifier is trained from synthetic data rather than relying on training data from other patients. A computer model (in silico) may be perturbed in many different ways to generate many different examples. The flow is calculated for each resulting example. A bench model (in vitro) may similarly be altered in many different ways. The flow is measured for each resulting example. The machine-learnt classifier uses features from medical scan data for a particular patient to estimate the blood flow based on mapping of features to flow learned from the synthetic data. Perturbations or alterations may account for therapy so that the machine-trained classifier may estimate the results of therapeutically altering a patient-specific input feature. Uncertainty may be handled by training the classifier to predict a distribution of possibilities given uncertain input distribution. Combinations of one or more of uncertainty, use of synthetic training data, and therapy prediction may be provided.