Synthetic Data Training for Domain-Specific Translation Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industries lacking standardized naming schemes for products face challenges in data exchange and inventory reconciliation due to proprietary naming conventions, leading to costly standardization efforts and labor-intensive manual mapping, with current machine learning approaches requiring labeled data that is time-consuming to obtain.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a generative AI model to generate synthetic training data based on a canonical reference ontology, allowing the creation and continuous improvement of domain-specific translation models that translate proprietary item names to standardized forms without initial labeled data, and incorporating user feedback for refinement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional machine learning methods are used for translation, then translation accuracy can be improved, but large corpora of labeled examples are required which are time-consuming to obtain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidtime to obtain labeled data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by generating synthetic labeled training data before actual model training begins. A generative AI model creates artificial proprietary item names and their corresponding standardized translations, forming a complete labeled corpus that can be used immediately for training the translation model without waiting for manual data collection and labeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating synthetic copies of real-world labeling scenarios through AI-generated data. Instead of collecting and labeling actual proprietary item names from multiple companies, the system generates artificial examples that replicate the structure and characteristics of real translation tasks, providing sufficient training material without the time-consuming manual process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If standardization efforts are implemented, then data exchange interoperability can be improved, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata exchange interoperabilityVSAvoidstandardization costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary approach by using AI-generated synthetic data as a bridge between proprietary naming conventions and standardized forms. Instead of forcing companies to adopt expensive standardization infrastructure or manual mapping processes, the system mediates translation through a trained model that learns from synthetic examples, enabling interoperability at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical standardization efforts (manual mapping, costly implementation infrastructure) with an intelligent system that uses machine learning models trained on synthetic data. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive manual intervention and complex standardization infrastructure while achieving the same interoperability goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual mapping efforts are used, then translation accuracy can be maintained, but labor intensity and error rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidmanual mapping labor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the translation model to automatically learn and perform translations without requiring ongoing manual mapping efforts. The model is trained on synthetic data and then autonomously handles translation tasks, eliminating the need for continuous human intervention while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user corrections to suggested mappings are captured and periodically integrated back into the training pipeline. This feedback loop allows the model to continuously improve its accuracy by learning from real-world usage patterns and corrections, gradually replacing manual mapping efforts with automated learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12462112B1Systems and methods for creating and continuously improving domain-specific translation models using synthetic data
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SOURCECAPS HOLDING INC
  • US12462112B1 patent drawing
  • US12462112B1 patent drawing
  • US12462112B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed herein for creating and continuously improving domain-specific translation models using synthetic data. The systems and methods can include creating a domain-specific translation model for product naming conventions, training the domain-specific translation model, and translating an arbitrary product name to a standardized product descriptor using the trained domain-specific translation model. The system can include a canonical reference ontology (CRO) defining a canonical ontology for a given domain, a generative AI model for creating synthetic training data based on the CRO, and a domain-specific translation model. The methods can include training the domain-specific translation model with the synthetic training data to translate arbitrary product names to standardized product descriptors for the domain.