System Call Filtering for Malware Detection and File Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing malware detection systems for Unix-like operating systems, such as Unix®/Linux®, lack effective mechanisms to detect and remediate malicious activities, particularly in environments like Ubuntu® and Red Hat®.

Innovation Solution

A malware detection system that utilizes a behavioral monitor to inject process code into user space processes, generating kernel space filters to intercept system calls, and upon detection of malicious activity, kills the process and restores previous versions of processes or files from backup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a behavioral monitor injects process code into user space processes and generates kernel space filters to intercept system calls, then malware detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a behavioral monitor as an intermediary component that sits between user space processes and the kernel. This monitor injects process code into user space processes and generates kernel space filters that intercept system calls before they reach the kernel, enabling detailed malware detection without requiring direct kernel modification for every monitoring operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides malware detection functionality into separate components: user space process monitoring, kernel space filter generation, and centralized analysis. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently with specialized functions, improving detection capability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If system calls are intercepted and analyzed in real-time, then malware detection accuracy is improved, but analysis time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The behavioral monitor performs preliminary actions by injecting process code into user space processes beforehand and pre-generating kernel space filters. This preparation allows system calls to be intercepted and routed for analysis without delay during actual malware detection operations, as the monitoring infrastructure is already in place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements efficient call routing that skips unnecessary analysis steps for known benign system calls while directing suspicious calls for detailed examination. This selective processing reduces overall analysis time while maintaining high detection accuracy for malicious activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If kernel space filters are generated to intercept system calls, then system call monitoring capability is improved, but memory overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem call monitoring capabilityVSAvoidmemory overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The behavioral monitor creates copies of system call interception functionality in kernel space filters rather than duplicating entire process monitoring contexts. This copying approach enables comprehensive system call monitoring while using minimal memory, as only the essential filter code and state information are duplicated in kernel space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If the behavioral monitor operates in kernel space, then detection reliability is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The behavioral monitor serves as an intermediary layer that operates in kernel space for reliable system call interception while providing a simplified user space interface for configuration and management. This architecture maintains detection reliability through kernel space operations while improving ease of operation through user space accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4288884B1Malware detection system
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 VALI CYBER INC
  • EP4288884B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4288884B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4288884B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A behavioral monitor executing in user space generates a plurality of filters corresponding to a plurality of processes executing in the user space. A first process transmits a system call to a corresponding filter of the plurality of filters in kernel space. The first process receives a signal from the corresponding filter. The first process analyzes the arguments submitted in the system call. The first process determines that the arguments may be associated with malicious activity. The first process generates an event and transmitting the event to the behavioral monitor. The behavioral monitor analyzes the event to determine whether the event is associated with malicious activity. The behavioral monitor causes a process group associated with the first process to cease executing and restores a previous version of the at least one file modified by the process group.