System and method for forced air control in a kamado-style cooker

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Kamado-style cookers require significant user expertise to effectively control air flow using manual dampers, limiting novice users' ability to achieve consistent cooking results.

Innovation Solution

A detachable forced air control system for kamado-style cookers that includes a fan and temperature sensor, allowing automatic air flow control through a proportional-integral-derivative algorithm, and a removable adapter for kamado-style cookers, and a plenum-like component for kettle-style grills, enabling bimodal air control without modifying the grill or cooker.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual dampers are used for air flow control, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to requiring significant user expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of air flow controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical damper operation with an automated electronic control system that includes a microcontroller, temperature sensor, and motorized damper actuator. This substitution eliminates the need for user expertise in manual damper manipulation while maintaining the mechanical damper structure for air flow control, thus improving ease of operation without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automatic temperature monitoring and control. The temperature sensor continuously monitors the cooking chamber, and the microcontroller automatically adjusts the damper position based on temperature feedback, eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention and expertise from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If automated forced air control is implemented, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of air flow controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated control system with electronic components including a microcontroller, temperature sensor, and motorized actuator to replace manual mechanical operation. This electronic substitution provides automated air flow control based on temperature feedback, significantly improving ease of operation while adding manageable electronic complexity rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback control mechanism where the temperature sensor continuously monitors the cooking chamber temperature, the microcontroller processes this information, and automatically adjusts the damper position accordingly. This feedback loop enables automated operation without requiring user expertise, improving ease of operation while the intelligence is contained within the compact electronic control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If manual damper adjustment is required, then device complexity remains low, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming temperature control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control system performs self-service by continuously monitoring temperature and automatically adjusting damper positions without requiring user intervention. This eliminates the time users would spend manually adjusting dampers and monitoring temperature, significantly improving cooking productivity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous temperature control through uninterrupted monitoring by the temperature sensor and continuous adjustment capability of the motorized damper actuator. This continuous action maintains optimal cooking conditions without interruption or manual intervention, improving productivity compared to periodic manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of operation

If retrofittable forced air control system is added, then ease of operation improves, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of air flow controlVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the automated control system into separate modular components: a control unit with electronic components, a motorized damper actuator, a temperature sensor, and a power supply module. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured independently using standard production techniques, and the complete system can be retrofitted to existing kamado-style cookers without requiring complete manufacturing retooling, thus maintaining ease of manufacture while providing automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary adapter or mounting bracket system that interfaces between the existing cooker structure and the new electronic control components. This intermediary element facilitates easy installation and removal of the automated control system without permanently modifying the original cooker, maintaining ease of manufacture for both the original and upgraded systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides novice users with consistent cooking results by automating air flow control, reducing the need for manual damper manipulation skills, and allowing seamless integration with existing grills/cookers without modifications.

Implementation Method 1

a forced air flow generated by a fan may also be provided into the plenum component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

The air control unit may further comprise a temperature sensor in electrical communication with an electronic controller configured to vary the speed of the fan

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 3

The electronic controller may be operable to apply a proportional-integral-derivative control algorithm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProportional-integral-derivative control:

Data Source

PatentUS12480660B2System and method for forced air control in a kamado-style cooker
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 SPIDER GRILLS LLC
  • US12480660B2 patent drawing
  • US12480660B2 patent drawing
  • US12480660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for a forced air flow into a kamado-style cooker comprises a control unit and an adapter defining an airflow duct with an entrance aperture and an exit aperture. The adapter is configured to removably mount over a lower damper port in a kamado-style cooker such that the exit aperture is aligned with the lower damper port. The control unit comprises an electric fan, one or more sensor input ports, and an airflow exit duct. The control unit is configured to separably mate with the adapter such that the airflow exit duct of the control unit is received by the entrance aperture of the adapter. Advantageously, a forced air flow generated by the electric fan, in response to a temperature signal input, passes out of the control unit, through the adapter, and into a body portion of the kamado-style cooker to encourage, facilitate and manage combustion within the cooker.