System-in-Package Process Design with Automated Design Checks
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing system-in-package technology-based manufacturing process is cumbersome, error-prone, and time-consuming, with high manual intervention, leading to increased production costs and reduced product competitiveness.
Innovation Solution
A method and system for designing and manufacturing system-in-package technology that involves acquiring design data and three-dimensional model data, associating and matching component attributes, performing assembly process analysis, and generating manufacturing programs to automate and simplify the process, reducing manual work and identifying design issues before fabrication.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If manual operations are used in the design and manufacturing process, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but the stability of fabrication is reduced and production time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables automated self-service through the design rule checking module that automatically detects design violations and generates error reports without human intervention. The manufacturing program generation module automatically creates fabrication programs from verified design data, eliminating the need for manual program creation and reducing fabrication instability caused by human error.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated computational systems. The design rule checking module uses automated algorithms to verify design compliance, and the manufacturing program generation module uses software automation to create fabrication programs, substituting manual mechanical processes with automated electronic systems that improve stability and reduce production time.
2Loss of time
If manual creation of component models is performed, then customization is possible, but time consumption increases and repeated modeling occurs
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements copying by storing verified component models in a library and automatically reusing them through the manufacturing program generation module. Instead of manually creating models repeatedly, the system copies existing validated models from the library, significantly reducing modeling time and eliminating redundant work while maintaining customization through selective model selection and modification.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-validating component models through design rule checking before they are stored in the library. This preliminary verification ensures that models are error-free before reuse, eliminating the need for repeated manual modeling and validation. The pre-validated models can be quickly copied and applied to multiple designs, reducing overall time consumption.
3Reliability
If design data is not verified before fabrication, then production speed is maintained, but manufacturing errors occur and production costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary design rule checking and verification before fabrication through the design rule checking module. This preliminary action identifies and flags potential manufacturing errors in advance, ensuring that only verified design data proceeds to production. By catching errors early, the system prevents costly rework and manufacturing failures while maintaining productivity through automated verification processes.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback through the error reporting and verification mechanism. The design rule checking module continuously monitors design data for violations and provides immediate feedback through error reports. This feedback loop allows designers to correct issues before fabrication, ensuring manufacturing accuracy while the automated nature of the feedback process minimizes impact on production cycle time.
4Device complexity
If complex manual processes are used, then design flexibility is maintained, but operator capability requirements increase and errors occur
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables self-service by automating complex verification and program generation tasks. The design rule checking module automatically performs compliance verification without requiring operator expertise in complex manufacturing rules. The manufacturing program generation module automatically translates verified design data into fabrication programs, eliminating the need for operators to manually navigate complex processes and reducing error rates associated with human complexity management.
Data Source
AI summary
A system-in-package technology-based process design method and system, a computer readable storage medium, and a device. The system-in-package technology-based process design method includes: acquiring design data of a layout and three-dimensional model data associated with the layout; associating and matching the design data with the three-dimensional model data according to the designed components' attribute information in the design data, and assembling the design data and the three-dimensional model data into an integrated package model; and performing assembly process analysis on the integrated package model to identify unreasonable design points used for design modifications and references, or directly exporting, from the integrated package model, a packaging process manufacturing program for fabrication.