Systems and devices for facilitating secure item retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The service industry faces inefficiencies in communication and transaction processes, particularly in crowded environments where bartenders and other service providers struggle to manage multiple customers, leading to long lines, chaos, and revenue loss due to difficulties in tracking orders and handling transactions, exacerbated by challenges like loud noise and COVID-19 restrictions.

Innovation Solution

A secure item retrieval system comprising a device with a receptacle and locking mechanism, connected to provider and recipient computing devices via a network, allowing for contactless ordering and payment through coded signals and authorization verification, enabling secure and efficient item retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional face-to-face service interaction is used, then personal service quality can be maintained, but operational efficiency decreases and wait times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice interaction qualityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a secure item retrieval device as an intermediary between the service provider and customer. The device includes a receptacle with locked doors that can be opened by the service provider to place items and by the customer to retrieve them, eliminating the need for continuous face-to-face interaction while maintaining secure transaction completion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service functionality where customers can independently retrieve their ordered items from the secure receptacle using authorization codes, and service providers can independently place items without direct customer presence. This autonomous interaction model improves efficiency while preserving service quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If multiple customers are served sequentially by limited staff, then service quality can be maintained, but wait times and customer frustration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidcustomer wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the service process into distinct phases: ordering through computing devices, secure item placement by providers, and independent customer retrieval. This segmentation allows multiple customers to be served simultaneously through parallel processing of orders, eliminating sequential bottlenecks while maintaining controlled access to items

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If contactless transaction systems are implemented, then operational efficiency and safety are improved, but secure item exchange becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The secure item retrieval device serves as a physical intermediary that simplifies contactless transactions. The receptacle with programmable locking mechanisms and authorized access codes provides a straightforward interface: providers place items through one door, customers retrieve through another, all without direct contact or complex authentication protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If secure locking mechanisms are added to receptacles, then item security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem securityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism acts as an automated intermediary that enforces security rules without human intervention. The system accepts simple inputs (authorization codes from computing devices) and automatically controls door locking/unlocking, providing high security through straightforward code verification rather than complex mechanical systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11992143B1Systems and devices for facilitating secure item retrieval
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 WHATZPOPPIN INC
  • US11992143B1 patent drawing
  • US11992143B1 patent drawing
  • US11992143B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides generally for systems and devices for facilitating secure item retrieval. According to the present disclosure, a secure item retrieval system may comprise at least one secure item retrieval device, at least one provider computing device, at least one recipient computing device, and one or more servers, all communicatively coupled via at least one network connection. In some aspects, the secure item retrieval device may comprise at least one receptacle, wherein the receptacle may comprise a top portion, a bottom portion, at least one sidewall, a first at least one opening, a second at least one opening, and at least one door. In some implementations, the secure item retrieval system may facilitate at least one contactless interaction between a provider and recipient.