Systems and methods for heat exchange

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thermal management systems in electronics and computing are inefficient and often added as secondary solutions, failing to consider thermal regulation in the initial design, leading to increased system costs and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop thermal regulation system using a first channel for liquid coolant, a second channel for vapor coolant, and a condenser for phase transition, with cooling interfaces and shut-off valves to control coolant flow and maintain temperature within a specified range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If traditional refrigeration systems are used to cool electronic systems, then the entire system or heat-generating components can be cooled, but the system complexity increases and costs increase due to secondary cooling systems being added after manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature regulationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cooling function into multiple cooling interfaces, each with its own shut-off valve, allowing independent control of different cooling zones. This segmentation enables targeted cooling of specific heat-generating components rather than cooling the entire system, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining effective temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control through shut-off valves that can adjust coolant flow to cooling interfaces based on real-time thermal conditions. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to adapt to varying heat generation patterns, optimizing cooling efficiency and reducing the need for oversized cooling infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If thermal regulation is added after manufacture of electronic systems, then thermal management can be implemented, but the system complexity increases and integration becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal managementVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is designed with universal cooling interfaces that can be integrated into various electronic system configurations. The modular architecture with standardized cooling interfaces and controllable flow distribution allows the same basic system design to serve multiple application scenarios, simplifying integration across different product lines while ensuring reliable thermal management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If coolant flow is increased to improve cooling efficiency, then heat dissipation improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback control through shut-off valves that respond to thermal conditions at each cooling interface. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust coolant flow dynamically, increasing flow only when and where heat dissipation is needed, thereby optimizing the balance between heat dissipation performance and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow distribution parameters of the coolant dynamically across different cooling interfaces. By adjusting flow rates and distribution patterns based on actual thermal loads, the system achieves efficient heat dissipation while minimizing the total energy required to pump and circulate the coolant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides effective and continuous thermal management, enhancing performance and reducing costs by efficiently regulating the temperature of heat sources using low-pressure multiphase cooling.

Implementation Method 1

at least one heat exchange unit for permitting heat to flow from a source of thermal energy to the liquid coolant from the coolant inlet, thereby permitting the liquid coolant to undergo phase transition to the vapor coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transition: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

at least one heat exchange unit for permitting heat to flow from a source of thermal energy to the liquid coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

a condenser that is configured to permit the vapor coolant to undergo phase transition to the liquid coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS12439561B2Systems and methods for heat exchange
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 ZUTA CORE LTD
  • US12439561B2 patent drawing
  • US12439561B2 patent drawing
  • US12439561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for heat exchange, such as cooling a heat source. A cooling system of the present disclosure may comprise a first channel that is configured to direct a liquid coolant, a second channel that is configured to direct a vapor coolant generated from the liquid coolant, and a condenser that is configured to permit the vapor coolant to undergo phase transition to the liquid coolant. The cooling system may further comprise at least one cooling interface in fluid communication with the first channel and the second channel. The cooling interface may be configured to facilitate heat exchange between the liquid coolant and a heat source.