Systems and methods for pressure control in a co2 refrigeration system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional pressure control mechanisms in CO2 refrigeration systems are inefficient, leading to energy wastage and suboptimal performance, as they often rely on simple mechanisms like pressure-relieving valves without effective regulation.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a controller that manages a gas bypass valve and a parallel compressor to regulate pressure within a receiving tank, adjusting threshold pressures dynamically based on measured pressure levels, allowing for efficient use of both mechanisms to maintain optimal pressure conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If a pressure-relieving valve is used to vent excess refrigerant vapor, then pressure control is achieved, but energy is wasted and system performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors pressure within the receiving tank and dynamically adjusts the operation of the gas bypass valve and parallel compressor based on real-time pressure readings, creating a closed-loop feedback system that optimizes pressure control while minimizing energy waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static pressure relief valves to dynamic control mechanisms where the gas bypass valve and parallel compressor are actively regulated based on varying pressure conditions, allowing adaptive response to changing system demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stress or pressure

If a gas bypass valve is used for pressure control, then pressure regulation is achieved, but energy efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller uses feedback from pressure sensors to intelligently determine when to activate the gas bypass valve or parallel compressor, ensuring pressure control is achieved only when necessary and minimizing unnecessary energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters by adjusting the threshold pressures and hysteresis values based on system conditions, allowing optimization of the balance between pressure control and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If threshold pressures are adjusted dynamically, then system performance is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically adjusts first and second threshold pressures based on feedback from pressure measurements and system performance, eliminating the need for manual calibration while optimizing system operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of control parameters through the controller that automatically modifies threshold values based on operating conditions, reducing the need for external intervention and simplifying operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances energy efficiency and system performance by dynamically controlling pressure through the combination of a gas bypass valve and a parallel compressor, reducing energy consumption and improving operational stability.

Implementation Method 1

the gas bypass valve being configured to vent excess CO2 vapor to a suction side of the one or more compressors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the parallel compressor being configured to compress CO2 vapor within the CO2 refrigeration system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

the controller is further configured to, determine a pressure within the receiving tank based on a measurement from a pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3339769B1Systems and methods for pressure control in a co2 refrigeration system
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 HILLPHOENIX INC
  • EP3339769B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3339769B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3339769B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling pressure in a CO2 refrigeration system are provided. The pressure control system includes a pressure sensor, a gas bypass valve, a parallel compressor, and a controller. The pressure sensor is configured to measure a pressure within a receiving tank of the CO2 refrigeration system. The gas bypass valve is fluidly connected with an outlet of the receiving tank and arranged in series with a compressor of the CO2 refrigeration system. The parallel compressor is fluidly connected with the outlet of the receiving tank and arranged in parallel with both the gas bypass valve and the compressor of the CO2 refrigeration system. The controller is configured to receive a pressure measurement from the pressure sensor and operate both the gas bypass valve and the parallel compressor, in response to the pressure measurement, to control the pressure within the receiving tank.