Genetically Modified T Cell Generation Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating genetically engineered T cells are inefficient, leading to contamination with modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors, which can cause adverse reactions and unwanted immune responses upon infusion, and require extensive processing time, often resulting in cytokine release syndrome and other severe side effects.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to rapidly generate genetically modified T cells within 24-72 hours by removing modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors, using a process that includes polyclonal activation, genetic modification, and enzymatic removal of contaminants, allowing for in vivo expansion and reducing the risk of adverse reactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If T cells are activated and genetically modified using conventional methods, then genetically modified T cells are produced, but the process takes extended time (often exceeding 144 hours) and results in contamination with modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of genetically modified T cellsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by removing modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors from the system at critical stages. Specifically, modulatory agents are removed after T cell activation (step f), and lentiviral vectors are removed after transduction (step g), resulting in purified genetically modified T cells free from contaminants that could cause adverse reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing T cell activation and genetic modification in a streamlined sequence within a compressed timeframe. The method pre-plans the entire process to complete critical steps (activation, transduction, and cleanup) within 144 hours or less, eliminating unnecessary intermediate steps and optimizing the timeline for clinical application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors are not removed from the cell product, then the manufacturing process is simpler and faster, but severe adverse reactions occur upon infusion including cytokine release syndrome, fever, hypotension, organ failure and deaths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of T cell generationVSAvoidtoxicity to patient
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potentially harmful presence of modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors into a beneficial outcome by systematically removing them. The contaminants that would normally cause severe toxicity are eliminated through structured cleanup steps, transforming a harmful process into a safe therapeutic product while maintaining manufacturing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively removing harmful substances before the cell product is administered to patients. Modulatory agents are removed after activation (step f) and lentiviral vectors are removed after transduction (step g), preventing potential adverse reactions before they can occur during infusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Quantity of substance

If extensive in-vitro expansion is performed to reach therapeutic cell numbers, then sufficient cell dosage is achieved, but the processing time is extended and contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of T cellsVSAvoidexpansion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing minimal in-vitro expansion (less than 10-fold, preferably less than 5-fold) rather than extensive expansion. The method recognizes that moderate expansion combined with efficient in-vivo expansion after infusion can achieve therapeutic cell numbers without the time loss and contamination risk associated with prolonged in-vitro culture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of time

If the manufacturing process is simplified and completed rapidly, then processing time is reduced, but the risk of contamination and insufficient cell quality may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing timeVSAvoidquality control of T cells
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by implementing a streamlined yet comprehensive process that continuously progresses through activation, transduction, and cleanup steps without unnecessary interruptions. The method ensures that quality control measures (removal of modulatory agents and lentiviral vectors) are integrated into the continuous workflow, maintaining high reliability within a compressed 144-hour timeframe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in genetically modified T cells that can effectively target cancer cells with reduced toxicity and side effects, demonstrating robust antitumoral activity and improved safety profiles by minimizing in vitro expansion and contamination, thus enabling quicker antitumor responses.

Implementation Method 1

genetic modification of the activated T cells by transduction with lentiviral vector particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTransduction:

Implementation Method 2

activation of the enriched T cells using modulatory agents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReceptor binding:

Data Source

PatentUS20220220504A1Method for Generation of Genetically Modified T Cells
Publication Date: 2022.07.14 MILTENYI BIOTEC BV & CO KG
  • US20220220504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220220504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220220504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method for the generation of genetically modified T cells comprising the steps a) a sample provided comprising T cells, b) preparation of said sample by centrifugation, c) enrichment of the T cells, d) activation of the T cells using modulatory agents, e) genetic modification of the T cells by transduction with lentiviral vector particles, f) removal of said modulatory agents, thereby generating a sample of genetically modified T cells, wherein said method is performed in equal or less than 144 hours, less than 120 hours, less than 96 hours, less than 72 hours, less than 48 hours, or less than 24 hours. In one embodiment of the invention said enrichment of T cells is performed by magnetic cell separation using magnetic particles that are directly or indirectly coupled to antibodies or antigen binding fragments thereof specific for CD4 and/or CD8 wherein said magnetic particles can be removed from the cells after separation.