T-Shaped Finger Splint with Rigid Stem and Flexible Top

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional splints for trigger finger and thumb are expensive, uncomfortable, and require customization, leading to poor adherence due to their rigidity and need for professional fitting, failing to effectively manage the symptoms of trigger finger and thumb.

Innovation Solution

A T-shaped splint with a rigid stem and flexible top, combined with adjustable securement straps, including a thumb securement strap for wrist engagement, made from materials like thermoplastic or metal within cushioning fabric, utilizing hook and loop fasteners for secure fitting, allowing partial immobilization of the finger or thumb.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional splints are custom-made by orthotists or hand therapists, then the splint can be precisely fitted to the user, but the cost increases and requires doctor's referral

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustom fit precisionVSAvoidprofessional service requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The splint is divided into modular components: a rigid stem portion for structural support and a separate flexible top portion for customization. This segmentation allows the rigid part to be mass-produced while the flexible part can be adjusted by the user, eliminating the need for professional custom fabrication while maintaining fit precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The splint incorporates user-adjustable mechanisms including hook-and-loop fasteners and elastic securement straps that allow the user to customize the fit themselves. This self-service approach eliminates the need for professional orthotist involvement while maintaining precise adaptation to the user's anatomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If conventional splints are made hard and rigid, then the splint provides strong immobilization, but the comfort decreases and user adherence drops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmobilization strengthVSAvoiduser comfort and adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The splint employs different material properties in different regions: the stem portion is made rigid for strong immobilization and structural support, while the top portion is made flexible and cushioned for comfort against the finger. This local differentiation allows simultaneous achievement of strong immobilization and user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The splint combines multiple materials with complementary properties: rigid thermoplastic or metal for the stem portion to provide immobilization strength, and flexible cushioning material for the top portion to ensure comfort. This composite construction resolves the contradiction between rigidity for immobilization and flexibility for comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional splints require professional customization, then the splint can be precisely fitted, but the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesplint fit precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the splint into a mass-producible rigid stem and a user-adjustable flexible top, the invention enables precise fitting without expensive professional customization. The rigid portion can be manufactured using standard injection molding or fabrication processes, while the flexible portion is adjusted by the user through simple fastening mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The user-adjustable design with hook-and-loop fasteners and elastic straps enables the user to customize the fit themselves, eliminating the need for expensive professional orthotist services. This self-service approach maintains manufacturing precision while dramatically reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If conventional splints are made adjustable to any size, then the adaptability increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize adjustabilityVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The splint incorporates dynamic adjustment elements including elastic securement straps and hook-and-loop fasteners that allow the user to modify the fit. These simple dynamic elements provide size adjustability without adding complex mechanisms, maintaining ease of use while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9775737B2Finger trigger splint for joint immobilization and flexion inhibition
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 SAYRE SERENITY
  • US9775737B2 patent drawing
  • US9775737B2 patent drawing
  • US9775737B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the present disclosure include a splint for resolving the symptoms of trigger finger/thumb. The splint may include a t-shaped main body, wherein a stem of the Tshape is rigid and includes a support bar configured to at least partially immobilize a user's finger and a top of the T-shape is rigid with a flexible portion configured to wrap around the finger. The splint may further include a securement strap extending from the top of the T-shape, the securement strap configured to engage with the top of the T-shape to secure the top of the Tshape around the finger. In embodiments where the splint is used on a thumb, the splint may further include a thumb securement strap configured to wrap around the user's hand/wrist to secure the splint in place.