T-Shaped Strap Assembly for Cargo Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo restraining devices for vehicles are complex, difficult to use, not easily adaptable to large differences in load size, and expensive to manufacture, failing to effectively secure cargo during transportation and prevent hazards such as shifting or ejection.

Innovation Solution

A T-shaped, three-buckle assembly coupled to a T-shaped strap assembly with tie-down clips and straps that can be positioned at various locations, providing a compact, universal, and cost-effective solution for securing cargo by wrapping straps around and over the load, anchored to the vehicle, preventing tipping and shifting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex cargo restraining devices with multiple straps and interconnected structures are used, then cargo security is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cargo restraining device is divided into modular components: a T-shaped strap assembly with three separate strap ends, a T-shaped buckle assembly with three independent buckles, and multiple removable tie-down clips. Each component performs a specific function and can be independently adjusted or replaced, simplifying the overall system while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The T-shaped strap and buckle assemblies serve multiple functions simultaneously: the three strap ends can restrain cargo from different directions (sides and top), the same assembly can adapt to various cargo sizes and shapes, and the device can be used in different vehicle types (trucks, trailers, boats). This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If fixed-configuration cargo restraining devices are used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but adaptability to different load sizes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidadaptability to load size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device incorporates adjustable elements including three separate buckles that can be positioned at different locations along the strap ends, and multiple tie-down clips that can be attached at various positions. This dynamic adjustability allows the same device to accommodate different cargo dimensions without requiring multiple fixed-configuration devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The effective length and configuration of the restraining straps can be changed by adjusting buckle positions and selecting different tie-down clip locations. The strap assembly can be configured to provide different levels of tension and coverage, allowing adaptation to various load sizes while using the same basic device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple interconnected straps forming nets or blankets are used, then cargo coverage is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo coverageVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of a single complex net or blanket structure, the device uses three separate strap ends that can be independently positioned and secured. Each strap end can be handled and adjusted separately, making the device easier to operate while still providing comprehensive cargo coverage through coordinated positioning of all three straps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device extracts the essential restraining function from complex interconnected nets and implements it through simpler, separate strap elements. The T-shaped configuration with three independent strap ends provides the necessary coverage without requiring the complexity of interconnected net structures, thereby improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If comprehensive cargo securing systems are used, then prevention of cargo shifting is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of cargo shiftingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies restraining force at three specific locations: two strap ends restraining the cargo from the sides and one strap end restraining from the top. This localized application of restraint at critical points effectively prevents cargo shifting in multiple directions without requiring a complex system that restrains every surface of the cargo.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10259375B2Cargo restraining apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 YOUNG NORMAN D
  • US10259375B2 patent drawing
  • US10259375B2 patent drawing
  • US10259375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cargo restraining apparatus includes a T-shaped buckle assembly configured to couple to a T-shaped strap assembly. The T-shaped strap assembly is configured to extend around and over the cargo and be secured to the cargo with the T-shaped buckle assembly. A plurality of tie-down clips is coupled to the T-shaped strap assembly at various locations along the sections of straps extending around the cargo. Each tie-down clip is configured to be coupled to a corresponding tie-down strap that extends from the clip to an anchor point of the vehicle or trailer.