Table Query Answering Using Cell Relevance Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine-learning models, particularly large language models, struggle with accurately answering questions from tables due to their susceptibility to noise and inability to process the underlying structure of tables, leading to inaccurate results and inefficient use of computational resources.

Innovation Solution

A system that calculates relevance scores for table cells based on a query, using a combination of unsupervised and weakly-supervised methods to focus machine-learning models on relevant content, suppressing irrelevant information and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional machine-learning models process entire table content, then comprehensive search results are generated, but accuracy decreases due to noise and computational resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the table content into individual cells and calculates relevance scores for each cell based on the query. This segmentation allows the system to identify and focus on relevant cells while excluding irrelevant ones, thereby improving search result accuracy and reducing computational resource consumption by processing only necessary portions of the table.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different relevance scores to different cells based on their specific relationship to the query. Cells with higher relevance scores are given more weight in the search result generation, while cells with lower scores are suppressed. This differential treatment improves accuracy by emphasizing relevant information and reduces computational waste by de-emphasizing irrelevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional machine-learning models process entire table content, then all available information is considered, but computational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by calculating relevance scores for table cells before the main search result generation process. This pre-processing step identifies and prioritizes relevant cells in advance, allowing the machine-learning model to focus computational resources on high-value information during the actual search, thereby improving both reliability and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by processing only the most relevant table cells rather than the entire table content. By using relevance scores to select a subset of cells for detailed processing, the system achieves sufficient search result reliability with reduced computational effort, avoiding the waste associated with processing all table content equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If relevance scoring is applied to table cells, then focus on relevant content is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent relevance identificationVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary relevance scoring mechanism that sits between the query and the table content processing. This intermediary layer calculates relevance scores based on query-table cell relationships and uses these scores to weight or filter content during search result generation. While this adds a processing step, it systematically improves relevance identification without requiring fundamental architectural changes to the machine-learning model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12505112B2Content relevance based table query answering
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 ADOBE INC
  • US12505112B2 patent drawing
  • US12505112B2 patent drawing
  • US12505112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Content relevance based table query answering is described. In one or more examples, a query and a table are received. The table includes a plurality of cells. A plurality of scores for calculated that correspond to the plurality of cells based on the query. One or more machine-learning models are then leveraged to generate a search result from the query, table, and scores, which is presented in a user interface for display.