Table Inventory Allocation System for Restaurant Seating Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Commercial establishments face inefficiencies in managing table and seat allocation due to manual processes, which can frustrate customers and staff, and existing systems do not effectively utilize data for optimal resource allocation based on factors like time of day, party size, and customer preferences.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that allocates table inventory based on party size, requested time, and specific allocation modes, using data on table status, turnover times, and customer preferences to efficiently manage seating and resources in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual processes are used to manage reservations and waitlists, then employees can make flexible decisions, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee flexibilityVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated table assignment where the computer system automatically assigns tables to parties based on pre-configured allocation modes and real-time availability, eliminating the need for manual employee intervention in table selection while maintaining optimal resource utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of table assignment with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to evaluate multiple factors including party size, reservation time, allocation mode, and real-time table availability to automatically determine optimal table assignments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated systems are implemented for table allocation, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the table allocation problem into distinct allocation modes (e.g., first-come-first-served, reservation-based, priority-based) that can be independently configured and managed, allowing the complex automated system to be broken down into manageable, configurable components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal allocation system that can handle multiple allocation scenarios and party types through a single automated platform that adapts to different allocation modes and requirements, reducing the need for separate specialized systems for different situations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If manual estimation methods are used for turnover, then implementation is simple, but allocation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidturnover estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor actual table turnover times and use this data to refine and adjust allocation decisions in real-time, improving accuracy by learning from past performance while maintaining relatively simple implementation through iterative optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10037585B2Systems and methods for managing table and seating use in commercial establishments
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 AGILYSYS NV LLC
  • US10037585B2 patent drawing
  • US10037585B2 patent drawing
  • US10037585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computerized systems and methods are provided for allocating and managing table and seating inventory at commercial establishments, such as restaurants. In one implementation, a computer-implemented method receives a first request to allocate table inventory at a commercial establishment. In some aspects, the first request may include a first party size and a first requested time. Based on a received request, the method may determine a mode of allocation associated with the commercial establishment. The method may identifying one or more first units of table inventory capable of accommodating the first party size at the first requested time. In certain aspects, the identification may be based on at least the determined allocation mode.