Keyword Search Table Ranking via Multi-Factor Scoring
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing structured data search systems face challenges in effectively indexing and ranking tables due to the diversity of content generation on the Internet, leading to less relevant search results and difficulty in determining the order of relevant tables, especially when multiple tables match search terms.
Innovation Solution
The method involves generating lists of candidate tables, computing table hit matrices, retrieving content from fields with keyword hits, generating ranking features, and calculating ranking scores to prioritize relevant tables in search query responses.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Quantity of substance
If multiple tables are returned as matches for search terms, then the quantity of search results increases, but the difficulty of determining relevant order increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the parameter of table evaluation from simple keyword matching to a multi-factor ranking system that considers keyword hits, field importance weights, and table-level features. This transforms the unordered set of matching tables into a ranked sequence based on computed relevance scores, resolving the difficulty of determining table order when multiple tables match search terms.
2Ease of manufacture
If structured data indexing is performed without considering field importance, then the indexing process is simpler, but the relevance of search results decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by assigning different importance weights to different fields within tables based on their relevance to search queries. Instead of treating all fields uniformly, the system identifies and weights specific fields (such as titles, headings, or content fields) differently, thereby improving search result relevance while maintaining a manageable indexing process through automated weight assignment.
3Measurement precision
If comprehensive table features are computed for ranking, then the accuracy of table ranking improves, but the computational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing and storing table features (such as field counts, table dimensions, and structural properties) during the indexing phase. When ranking is needed, these pre-computed features are readily available, avoiding the need to recalculate them from scratch. This reduces the computational complexity during the ranking phase while maintaining accurate table ranking based on comprehensive features.
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention extends to methods, systems, and computer program products for ranking tables for keyword search. Aspects of the invention include generating lists of candidate tables for inclusion in a search query response, computing table hit matrices, retrieving content from fields of candidate tables having keyword hits, generating ranking features of tables, and computing ranking scores for tables. Aspects of the invention can be used to match keywords against column names, to match keywords against values in subject and non-subject columns, and to match keywords against table descriptions like page titles, table captions, cell values, nearest headings and surrounding text. Which keywords are matched against which fields can depend on the table and/or the query (referred to as “late binding”).


