Table-top cooking device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing table-top cooking devices occupy a lot of space and require significant user coordination to prepare multiple dishes simultaneously, as they often need to be used sequentially rather than in parallel, conflicting with the desire for healthy, varied meals in less time.

Innovation Solution

A compact table-top cooking device with multiple food preparation chambers that can operate simultaneously, each with its own autonomous cooking environment and independently controlled cooking methods and parameters, allowing for the preparation of different dishes with varying cooking conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple dishes are prepared using known table-top cooking devices, then the user can prepare healthy meals, but the device occupies a lot of space and requires considerable user coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to prepare multiple different dishesVSAvoidspace occupied by the device
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking device is divided into multiple independent cooking chambers (first chamber, second chamber, third chamber), each capable of operating autonomously with different cooking methods and parameters. This segmentation allows multiple dishes to be prepared simultaneously without requiring a single large device, thereby reducing the overall space footprint while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking chambers are arranged vertically in a stacked configuration rather than horizontally side-by-side. This vertical arrangement utilizes the height dimension to accommodate multiple independent cooking environments, effectively reducing the horizontal footprint and allowing the device to fit on standard kitchen countertops while preparing multiple dishes simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple dishes are prepared using known table-top cooking devices, then the user can prepare varied meals, but significant user coordination is required to have all dishes ready at the right time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to prepare varied meals with different cooking methodsVSAvoiduser coordination effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each cooking chamber is equipped with independent controls for cooking method selection and parameter adjustment, allowing users to set different cooking programs simultaneously without coordination. The first chamber can steam vegetables while the second chamber fries potatoes and the third chamber grills meat, all operating autonomously based on user-prepared settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates programmable control systems that allow users to pre-set cooking parameters for multiple chambers. Once configured, each chamber automatically executes its cooking cycle independently, eliminating the need for continuous user monitoring and coordination during the cooking process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Area of stationary object

If a single cooking device is used to prepare multiple dishes, then space is saved, but the device requires considerable coordination and cannot operate chambers independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekitchen space utilizationVSAvoidindependent control of cooking parameters per dish
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device comprises three physically separated cooking chambers, each with independent heating elements, temperature controls, and cooking method selections. This allows each chamber to operate autonomously with different parameters (e.g., chamber 1 at 100°C for steaming, chamber 2 at 180°C for frying, chamber 3 for grilling), maintaining full adaptability while occupying compact vertical space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By stacking cooking chambers vertically, the device maximizes the use of vertical space rather than horizontal space. This dimensional reconfiguration allows three independent cooking environments to coexist in a compact footprint suitable for kitchen countertops, while each chamber retains full independent control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11653786B2Table-top cooking device
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 VERSUNI HLDG BV
  • US11653786B2 patent drawing
  • US11653786B2 patent drawing
  • US11653786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A table-top kitchen device, comprising a first food preparation chamber and at least a second food preparation chamber. The first and second food preparation chamber are operable simultaneously to prepare food that in use is received therein. The first and second food preparation chamber are physically separated from each other in such way that each chamber includes an autonomous cooking environment, wherein the cooking conditions, that is, a cooking method and/or at least one cooking parameter can differ per food preparation chamber.