Tabular Generative AI Grounding With Traceable Intermediate Tables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Table QA models struggle with complex queries and tables, often producing hallucinated results due to their black-box nature, making it difficult to validate answers and leading to inaccurate downstream applications.

Innovation Solution

The Plan-of-Query (POQ) system decomposes queries into atomic steps, translates them into database manipulation commands, and generates intermediate tables, providing visibility into the reasoning process to prevent hallucinations and allow validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If LLM is integrated into Table QA models to enable complex reasoning, then the model's reasoning capability is improved, but the process becomes invisible and errors cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning capabilityVSAvoiderror detectability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the LLM's reasoning process into discrete, traceable steps by introducing intermediate tables that represent each reasoning stage. Instead of a single black-box output, the reasoning is divided into multiple visible steps with intermediate results, allowing users to audit and validate each step while maintaining the LLM's complex reasoning capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate tables as intermediary artifacts between the input query and the final answer. These intermediate tables serve as a mediator that makes the reasoning process transparent and verifiable, allowing users to see exactly how the LLM processes information without sacrificing the model's sophisticated reasoning abilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If LLM is used to process queries through multiple intermediate steps, then the reasoning process becomes more complex and capable, but the opacity increases making validation difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereasoning capabilityVSAvoidprocess opacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex reasoning process into discrete, labeled steps with corresponding intermediate tables. Each step is explicitly documented and traceable, transforming the opaque complex process into a series of transparent, auditable operations that maintain reasoning capability while reducing complexity opacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual highlighting and annotation techniques to make different parts of the reasoning process visible and distinguishable. By visually marking intermediate tables and reasoning steps, the system makes the complex process more transparent and easier to validate without sacrificing reasoning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Productivity

If conventional Table QA models operate in black box nature, then the model can process queries efficiently, but incorrect predictions and hallucinations cannot be easily uncovered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery processing efficiencyVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the query processing into efficient LLM-based reasoning steps while introducing intermediate tables that document each step's input and output. This segmentation allows the system to maintain efficient processing through LLM capabilities while adding visibility to detect and prevent hallucinations through traceable intermediate results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by providing users with access to intermediate tables and reasoning steps, enabling them to validate and verify the process. This feedback loop allows users to detect incorrect predictions and hallucinations in real-time, improving reliability without significantly impacting processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12436935B1System and method for grounding outputs in tabular generative artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12436935B1 patent drawing
  • US12436935B1 patent drawing
  • US12436935B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods and processes, apparatuses or systems, and media for generating a grounded answer to a query using a corresponding table are disclosed. The present disclosure provides decomposing a complex query into natural-language sub-queries or steps, which are then translated into database manipulation commands to sequentially transform input table into intermediate or simplified tables, until the input table is simplified for performing a final decision query. Each of the sub-queries may be associated with corresponding intermediate or simplified tables to ground the sub-queries.